My day job is security researcher at Intel Corporation. I'm interested in EDA tools and RTL analysis, systems programming, embedded programming, and the many challenges that intersect with that world.
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/bengnl; my proof: https://keybase.io/bengnl/sigs/cYVoDysjOMs0TJKfmofAZPhd0BFqtV5jZNCOynkHBUs ]
I see how jarring it is for you, but I want to comment-vouch against your flag. If you slow down a little, you can spot some meaning there. Its oddly phrased, but it does make sense that vectors (as in: simd vectors) are the building blocks of execution (to put it closer to how I might say it).
I’ve had similar ideas in the past: clearly simd is the way to get the most out of your cpu. Can we design a language where all operations are automatically simd, and it takes effort to do anything in scalars?
And I guess these array languages are what you might get.
It’s not ‘unit vector of thought,’ btw, which is weirder than what it says.
Wow, that is honestly a bit freaky - first I’ve heard of anything like that. I will assume it was a client side action, but still horribly invasive if that’s how it went. I’ll try to find more about this possibility.
Can you be sure WhatsApp retroactively censored a message? Implying someone else but the direct recipient could read and delete/change it? (I believe group chats are different, forgot the details.) I don’t want to be dismissive but.. well i dont believe this is the best explanation given just these observations.
I don’t get what you’re implying. What is repatriating; You think they will move their workloads to on-prem?
Is there something different about the world that changed the trade-off calculus for cloud vs on-prem from how it was in the last 15 years compared to now?
(I’m as anti-cloud-overspend as the next guy on hn btw. Just trying to make sense of your comment’s worldview.)
As a thought experiment - such shocks (govt pressure to use models for bad purposes and govt excluding access to non-Americans) coming early in the ‘ai revolution’ will wake up the rest of the world sooner that they have to get their act together to stay competitive without relying on USA. Just like with nato.
Can you write a more specific question? I think the meaning of the comment is clear enough, but maybe you’re asking for more specifics? Ironically I can not understand what you are asking for with such a generic comment.
Your last paragraph hit home with me. I also find it refreshing to be clear and direct, have the intent be directly understood, and have a pleasant, good faith, high signal conversation as a result. I hardly ever experience that with humans (I recognize that that’s not ‘everyone else’s fault’ of course).
My day job is security researcher at Intel Corporation. I'm interested in EDA tools and RTL analysis, systems programming, embedded programming, and the many challenges that intersect with that world.
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/bengnl; my proof: https://keybase.io/bengnl/sigs/cYVoDysjOMs0TJKfmofAZPhd0BFqtV5jZNCOynkHBUs ]
email: [email protected]