This isn't accurate either. Java does not enforce 1 file = 1 public class but rather 1 file = 1 public top-level class.
For example this is totally legit:
// ClassA.java
public class ClassA {
public static class ClassA_Inner_Public_Static {
}
public class ClassA_Inner_Public {
}
}
// ClassB.java
public class ClassB {
ClassA classa = new ClassA();
ClassA_Inner_Public classA_Inner_Public = new ClassA().new ClassA_Inner_Public();
ClassA_Inner_Public_Static classA_Inner_Public_Static = new ClassA_Inner_Public_Static();
}
The thing is, actual educated, reasoned adults should be capable of understanding the point a person is making, without straining at a gnat, and without making a mountain out of a mole hill.
Our society, says everyone, is way too sensitive and "PC". And, yet, we continue to attack people over the slightest perception of wrong doing.
My point was that he wasn't actually saying he doesn't want for anything. Of course he does, and yes for him that includes Netflix.
My point was that his argument was that he generally knows what he wants and doesn't want to be incessantly marketed to -- yet, because of bad wording, you made it sound like he was erroneously claiming he wants nothing.
Almost by definition, we all want something. But that does not require constant marketing.
To add, one could extend the argument to many situations. An alcoholic friend, for example, who caves when you pressure him.
Edit to add: my comment above demonstrates that you guys who jumped on the comment about rape and flagged it, you didn't bother to actually think of the logic behind his comment. All you did was have an emotional overreaction and freak out tantrum. Well, mine used peer pressure instead of rape, but it's the exact same argument. Let's see how you can drum up a freak out about mine. Lol. Morons.
It's comments like this that make reading comments so much suck.
You took one tiny misworded part of his entire post and highlighted it to make an issue out of it. When you knew dang well what his overall argument was and what he really meant with that tiny badly worded part.
Don't make the mistake of conflating liberal with progressive, republican with conservative, nor the idea that someone who values small govt is necessarily a conservative. Those are all substantially different things, even though current majorities make them SEEM equivalent.
As a thought experiment, consider that most of our nation's founders were liberal but they favored small govt. Also, there is a number of people today who believe in classical liberalism but don't identify as progressive nor conservative; they are usually called libertarian.
Libertarians would generally eschew both Eisenhower, big govt programs, AND progressivism.
Don't make the mistake of conflating liberal with progressive, republican with conservative, nor the idea that someone who values small govt is necessarily a conservative. Those are all substantially different things, even though current majorities make them SEEM equivalent.
As a thought experiment, consider that most of our nation's founders were liberal but they favored small govt. Also, there is a number of people today who believe in classical liberalism but don't identify as progressive nor conservative; they are usually called libertarian.
Libertarians would generally eschew both Eisenhower, big govt programs, AND progressivism.
ummm... you might want to try re-reading your reply and reflect on the OP's observation... your overly sensitive read of their post and vicious reply of your own suggests to me that you are not happy... and thus, presuming you don't have kids, supports OP's point.
Correct. So instead of saying veganism, we should instead be saying real/fresh food... at least, based on this article. Not saying you can't be vegan, just that this article isn't saying that.
I'm all for eating fresh fruit, vegetables, roots, etc, but I don't see how this article supports only a plants based diet? Really I think what it's saying is avoid mass produced food, no?
For example, the locally sourced fresh beef I buy from my local farmer?
For example this is totally legit: