HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

dbroockman

no profile record

Submissions

Effects on Political Views in OpenResearch's Basic Income Study

twitter.com
2 points·by dbroockman·há 2 anos·0 comments

Unconditional Cash Study: first findings available

openresearchlab.org
232 points·by dbroockman·há 2 anos·644 comments

Antithesis – Autonomous Testing

antithesis.com
43 points·by dbroockman·há 2 anos·2 comments

Booster dose of Pfizer vaccine shows 95.6% efficacy in Phase 3 trial

cnn.com
2 points·by dbroockman·há 5 anos·1 comments

comments

dbroockman
·há 3 anos·discuss
Another one: don’t program your own AB testing framework! Every time I’ve seen engineers try to build this on their own, it fails an AA test (where both versions are the same so there should be no difference). Common reasons are overly complicated randomization schemes (keep it simple!) and differences in load times between test and control.
dbroockman
·há 3 anos·discuss
CA YIMBY has been making a lot of progress on this at the state level. If this stuff makes you mad it’s a good org to donate to: https://cayimby.org/
dbroockman
·há 4 anos·discuss
This is a rewriting of history. Before we ever had results from the COVID vaccine trials, the FDA declared that the primary goal of the trials was to prevent any symptomatic infection in the first place. From June 2020: https://www.fda.gov/media/139638/download.
dbroockman
·há 5 anos·discuss
And that’s 95.6% efficacy relative to two shots! Relative to no shots it must be like 97%. Wow.
dbroockman
·há 5 anos·discuss
This paper is intended as a sarcastic critique of the push towards conducting randomized trials in academia/medicine, but it’s an obvious straw man. You could write this sarcastic article for any research method - “see, why do research using method X when we already know the answer from other methods?”

The problem is that there are plenty of research questions where RCTs show us that previous non-RCTs were wrong.