Absolutely not. DHH is problematic and the foundation doesn't seem to really have a voice beyond his. The technology is great, but the community does have a problem with leadership - and not having a leadership team own the branding and communication is problematic long term. Yes, there have been many changes recently but it's only been because DHH approves of it - it's not really consensus driven by different experiences using Ruby on Rails.
Look at the trademark of other tools and you'll see that they are owned and driven by groups of people who share common ground and come to decisions that are in the interest of making technology better - not because one person was convinced of the idea it (look at how TypeScript was ripped out because DHH didn't like it).
I've been working with Ruby on Rails since 2007 and I love where it's at right now and the direction it's going, but I cannot fully trust a framework that is at the whims of one person.
Look at the trademark of other tools and you'll see that they are owned and driven by groups of people who share common ground and come to decisions that are in the interest of making technology better - not because one person was convinced of the idea it (look at how TypeScript was ripped out because DHH didn't like it).
I've been working with Ruby on Rails since 2007 and I love where it's at right now and the direction it's going, but I cannot fully trust a framework that is at the whims of one person.