What do you think are the chances that they used data collected from users for the past couple of years and are propping up performance in those use cases instead of the promised generality?
So 2 trillion dollars to do what Word could do in 1995... and trying to promote that as an advancement is not propaganda? Sure let's double the amount of resources a couple more times who knows what it will be able to take on after mastering spelling.
0 - Not faceplanting when trying to run