We should keep the system in place that we have at the US federal level, but add initiative, referendum, and recall.
This allows the citizens to "correct" the legislators, and
allows more controversial laws to be passed which legislatures typically avoid.
The only problem I see with this is keeping the moneyed
special interests at bay.
The "Opulent Minorities" rights should be balanced with mob rule. Unfortunately in the US today, the Opulent Minority decides the laws for the rest of us, unless there is nearly unanimous dissent.
I agree, however, a lot of what is in the article is still very relevant today. That speaks in and of itself. Just who is governing this country anyway, it's corporeal citizens, or the corporations? See below (although the Democrats are equally as guilty in my eyes) :
St. Paul Pioneer Press - 03/03/2016 - A10
Reaping a whirlwind
An open letter to the Republican establishment
You are the captains of American industry, the titans of Wall Street, and the billionaires who for decades have been the backbone of the Republican Party.
You’ve invested your millions in the GOP in order to get lower taxes; wider tax loopholes; bigger subsidies; more generous bailouts; less regulation; lengthier patents and copyrights and stronger market power, allowing you to raise prices; weaker unions and bigger trade deals, allowing you outsource abroad to reduce wages; easier bankruptcy for you but harder bankruptcy for homeowners and student debtors; and judges who will let you to engage in insider trading and who won’t prosecute you for white-collar crimes.
All of which has made you enormously wealthy. Congratulations.
But I have some disturbing news for you. You’re paying a big price — and you’re about to pay far more.
First, as you may have noticed, most of your companies aren’t growing nearly as fast as they did before the Great Recession. Your sales are sputtering, and your stock prices are fragile.
That’s because you forgot that your workers are also consumers. As you’ve pushed wages downward, you’ve also squeezed your customers so tight they can hardly afford to buy what you have to sell.
Consumer spending comprises 70 percent of the American economy. But the typical family is earning less today than it did in 2000, in terms of real purchasing power.
Most of the economic gains have gone to you and others like you who spend only a small fraction of what they rake in. That spells trouble for the economy— and for you.
You’ve tried to lift your share prices artificially by borrowing money at low interest rates and using it to buy back your shares of stock. But this party trick works only so long. Besides, interest rates are starting to rise.
Second, you’ve instructed your Republican lackeys to reduce your taxes and your corporation’s taxes so much over the last three decades — while expanding subsidies and bailouts going your way — that the government is running out of money.
That means many of the things you and your businesses rely on government to do — build and maintain highways, bridges, tunnels and other physical infrastructure; produce high-quality basic research; and provide a continuous supply of well-educated young people — are no longer being done as well as they should. If present trends continue, all will worsen in years to come.
Finally, by squeezing wages and rigging the economic game in your favor, you have invited an unprecedented political backlash — against trade, immigration, globalization and even against the establishment itself.
The pent-up anger and frustration of millions of Americans who are working harder than ever yet getting nowhere, and who feel more economically insecure than ever, has finally erupted. American politics has become a cesspool of vitriol.
Republican politicians in particular have descended into the muck of bigotry, hatefulness and lies. They’re splitting America by race, ethnicity and religion. The moral authority America once had in the world as a beacon of democracy and common sense is in jeopardy. And that’s not good for you or your businesses.
Nor is the uncertainty all this is generating. A politics based on resentment can lurch in any direction at almost any time. Yet you and your companies rely on political stability and predictability.
You follow me? You’ve hoisted yourself on your own petard. All that money you invested in the Republican Party in order to reap short-term gains is now reaping a whirlwind.
You would have done far better with a smaller share of an economy growing more rapidly because it possessed a strong and growing middle class.
You’d have done far better with a political system less poisoned by your money — and therefore less volatile and polarized, more capable of responding to the needs of average people, less palpably rigged in your favor.
But you were selfish and greedy, and you thought only about your short-term gains.
You forgot the values of a former generation of Republican establishment that witnessed the devastations of the Great Depression and World War II, and who helped build the great postwar American middle class.
That generation did not act mainly out of generosity or social responsibility. They understood, correctly, that broad-based prosperity would be good for them and their businesses over the long term.
So what are you going to do now? Will you help clean up this mess — by taking your money out of politics, restoring our democracy, de-rigging the system, and helping overcome widening inequality of income, wealth and political power?
Or are you still not convinced?
Former U.S. Secretary of Labor Robert Reich is Chancellor’s Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley and senior fellow at the Blum Center for Developing Economies. His new book, “Saving Capitalism: For the Many, Not the Few,” is now in bookstores. He wrote this column for Tribune Content Services.
If I weren't in San Diego and in SV or SF instead, I'd move to another city like Los Angeles, or where I am now. Most other US states allow noncompetes. I won't sign a noncompete
so unless they'll let me work without one, I won't be working outside of California.
Additionally, California labor laws are more employee friendly when compared to other states.
I know this limits my choices as businesses are leaving California due to the employee-friendly labor laws and the high cost of housing, but I'm semi-retired anyway so it doesn't matter to me. I can be choosy when it comes to taking a job.
It's not really an argument to keep them out. We should let them in when real demand is there. Right now, its a race to the bottom in this country due to job market manipulation by business.
Also I'm all for letting Indian entrepreneurs into the country because they will create jobs.
Is should be slightly more expensive to bring in immigrants
because one of the governments missions voters expect is to ensure that there is a job market where there are good well-paying jobs, not a market where it is flooded with immigrants that have driven down wages. Having American citizens and green card holders idled or having to work in a lower paying job is not a true free market because only the employers are benefiting.
Once the domestic pool of potential employers has dried up, then employers will bring in the slightly more expensive foreign labor.
Google in a hypothetical case would then offer a lower salary to cover the visa cost, and/or deem it too much trouble to bring the H-1B on board. This leaves the H-1B worker operating in a suboptimal market. The issue of visa fees does not confront the H-1B employee, only the employer which sponsored them in the first place. Besides it should cost slighly more to bring in an H-1B than current parket rates. Maybe then more natives would be hired.
Maybe you should have paid them as much as what they would make at Google then. Having to compete on salary,benefits, and working environment is the true meaning of an open and free market, not a rigged market as the current H-1B system is.
The elected federal government officials need campaign contributions to stay in office, and most campaign financing comes from the businesses. Until we curtail this, you will not see any meaningful reform to the H-1B visa.
Now you know the real reason why the republican party is doing all it can to repeal the Affordable Care Act. Controlling access to benefits keeps people in jobs they really don't like. Benefits need to be decoupled from work.
Which may explain why the unemployment rate is so low in Texas. Anybody who already lives there is employed if they want to be, and are employable. Texas has trouble attracting talent from outside of the state for the reason you mentioned, and the backward labor laws in the state.
This is simply not true. It has nothing to do with at-will employment. It is state law. Some states require consideration separate from salary, some say continued employment is sufficient consideration. 49 out of 50 states recognize the doctrine of at-will employment. Only Montana uses just-cause instead (just like the rest of the developed world coincidentally).
The only problem I see with this is keeping the moneyed special interests at bay.