"Pig butchering" alludes to the method and callousness of the scammer and has nothing to do with the victim. That would be like criticizing the term "whaling" for comparing targets to whales.
I think a more apt comparison is to fungus -- it can be part of a healthy ecosystem, rotting and breaking down old growth. It can also take hold of an otherwise healthy host long before its natural end, and just like with our bodies and food we take steps to mitigate that.
"Controlled experiments have used various landing substrates, including striped and solid oil tray traps, sticky plastic, smooth plastic, cloth (Experiment 2 in [22]), horse blankets or sheets, and paint on live animals."
I currently use Postman but havent had problems yet, though next week I'm joining an API crew. Your opinion seems strong; could you tell me where you ran into pitfalls with it I should look out for?
I have definitely noticed the perpetrator fixation; I always thought it was an attempt to respect the privacy of the families rather than obsession. But in this specific case -- and I'm not trying to be sarcastic here -- could the lack of contact to the victim be a result of there being no citation, instead? Not enough people knowing who the victim was, perhaps in combination with the bystander effect? I have no experience in the industry so I don't know if it'd be likely, but it seems plausible.