Author here: All code before removing [WIP] in a PR has been humanly reviewed, tested, then double and tripled checked with /skills. Then it comes code review, answering comments, etc.
This is what I do mainly. I spend more time designing the solution, iterating by hand when it matters and anything that should be automated, let it be.
I instruct the agents to do the commit messages they way i want them written. They don't produce a book everytime, they produce what I think it's useful.
I have my own tooling set in every project https://www.minid.net/2026/6/1/my-ai-workflow. I have couple dozens of make commands, that perform all the checks. I can do them manually after I finish coding or, I relegate these to the AI. If something is wrong, that's when I intervene. If nothing is wrong, that's because I've spent quite some time checking every single change.
I wrote software before Stack Overflow existed, before Git existed, and before most of the tools I use today existed. I think I will survive an API outage :)
Question for the locals: I don’t live in the USA, but I’d love to visit the boneyards someday and get inside some planes to take pictures. Are the boneyards open to the public? Do you need permission?
Yes. Processing information is one thing. Creating momentum among investors, employees, partners, and customers who often want different things is another.
I agree, but I think we are talking about slightly different things. I am not skeptical of solopreneurs at all (I have been one myself). The post is more about the current idea that large companies can keep replacing entire teams with AI until eventually there is barely anyone left.