Maybe it's just accusations, although I remember reading articles as well. Although maybe if Jimmy was more transparent about where his wealth came from, and maybe if Wikipedia didn't disingenuously and constantly beg for money despite having a surplus, I'd be less skeptical.
> Yes, when it comes to face scanners at the airport. You’re standing in front of a government camera for a driver’s license or student id and it can (and likely will) take the same image data that the TSA cameras do.
This is wrong. The TSA cameras are steroscopic and capture significantly more detail.
Additionally, there is no oversight or information given about how that data will be used, sold, how long it will be kept for, etc.
If you want to be entirely complacent that's your choice. But it isn't 'silly' for those of us that understand what's going on to oppose it, and it's disingenuous to easy because we have drivers licenses there is no reason to oppose it.
I suspect you understand it pretty much perfectly, you just don't think the underlying premises of my position are correct.
> Wales has never received compensation from the Wikimedia Foundation.
Buying an expensive sportscar in the name of the foundation and then using it as though it were a personal car wouldn't show up as compensation.
I tried finding more, but the accusations against Wales are mentioned on the wiki page for wiki controversies: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedia_controversie...
Maybe it's just accusations, although I remember reading articles as well. Although maybe if Jimmy was more transparent about where his wealth came from, and maybe if Wikipedia didn't disingenuously and constantly beg for money despite having a surplus, I'd be less skeptical.