"you are likely overestimating your own contributions at work"
Based on what? Your own zero-evidence speculation? How is this anything other than arrogant punting? For sure we know that the point was something other than how fast the author reads compared to an AI, so what are we left with here?
My research work (lots of fun working on the aesthetics for this one): https://newdesigncongress.org
And threat modelling company: https://parare.al