And unfortunately “productive” needs to be part of the package. I have worked with some incredibly smart people that I really respected who had a very hard time getting anything done.
Thanks, I really didn’t get what they meant with the example they were using.
Out of curiosity why is writing everything as a single element type more ergonomic? I’ve not done frontend web dev in a while and using <p> <h1> and so on seems like it would be more ergonomic to express intent.
At work we use snapshot tests to see visual changes to ui. It helps a lot with code review especially with adding edge case data to tight designs.
We use ui tests specifically for testing accessibility, analytics and data passed along during navigation.
We use fixtures for all of this.
None of these tests really help with bugs. What they do help with is:
- Making sure the ui stays really decoupled from the business logic. This helps a lot with getting the data unit tested which does help a lot with bugs.
- Making sure that analytics and accessibility are not forgotten about. This helps a ton when refactoring.
- Making the intent of the code really clear during review.
It takes a bit of practice and being ruthless about removing/fixing stuff that’s not helping. I have found it makes it much easier for new developers to work, review code and understand how the code is organized. YMMV.
People vastly underestimate how complex client side code can get and how much automatic functionality browsers hand you. Whereas a nice web framework has users, permissions, session management, templating, validations and forms all set up for you with battle tested out of the box behaviors.
A frontend framework is great if you are a company that really needs to slim down bandwidth and can hire expensive devs to maintain it. But for a simple no nonsense business application it’ll just slow you down and will gravitate towards being a mess.
The online ad industry is super shady and is getting much worse since google and facebook have started eating their lunch. But it would be very hard to pull data collection out of this business model. If company a puts the lawnmower ad up and only reports clicks and company b reports the percentage of men aged 35-40 company b will eventually put company a out of business. Content providers have to run what ads will actually make them money so they’re going to go with networks where companies actually buy ads. The only way this cycle is going to get stopped is with serious pushback either from consumers, technology or laws.
I really wish there was some sort of proper monetization model for rss. The web has no reason to be this obnoxious pile of bloated unreadable spyware. I want to support more of these companies because I think what they do is important but it gets hard to justify 10 bucks a month for each of them. When I try and whitelist ads I often find I can’t even find content on the site anymore and my browser slows to a crawl.