Cells phones are not comparable to an online service.
Property rights are a thing and those who own the servers can determine what they will store and present to other users.
Conservative groups that don't spread misinformation and hatred are thriving on FB and Twitter. Change the law to make them store and publish anything not already illegal will turn them into cesspools like the various *chan sites inside of a month and advertisers will leave as will people with a conscience.
That is what I was thinking, a very heavy "micro" instance.
I am curious what exactly this is envisioned for. Running micro services do not require such things and the system requirements are so heavy, it would need more hardware to run that just running them all in a normal distro.
I never jumped on the container bandwagon since it seems like it adds overhead for very little gain that can't be done with much lighter solution.
Am I correct in thinking this is a designated safe space?
Since they ban 'non-conservative' accounts the claim to being more free speech than twitter or FB is hardly accurate.
A true free speech social media platform, which this is not, would be an interesting experiment. It would end badly but the entertainment value would be quite high until it implodes. Pity that they are not actually interested in free speech.
Besides, if they get a non-trivial amount of users, the stability they claim the platform has will not last.
Property rights are a thing and those who own the servers can determine what they will store and present to other users.
Conservative groups that don't spread misinformation and hatred are thriving on FB and Twitter. Change the law to make them store and publish anything not already illegal will turn them into cesspools like the various *chan sites inside of a month and advertisers will leave as will people with a conscience.