HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

rcarback

no profile record

Submissions

The Class Gap in Career Progression: Evidence from US Academia [pdf]

annastansbury.github.io
3 points·by rcarback·há 2 anos·0 comments

Step-by-step NEST single neuron simulation

fabriziomusacchio.com
3 points·by rcarback·há 2 anos·0 comments

comments

rcarback
·há 2 anos·discuss
There are a number of such systems that do this via revoting or dummy ballots. One of my projects, Votexx, uses vote nullification (or flipping) via a trusted third party chosen by the voter.

The general idea for all of these is if you add uncertainty you reduce what a coercer is willing to pay creating a mutually assured destruction scenario whereby the system being in place ensures nobody ever tries it.

Votexx.org if you want to learn more.
rcarback
·há 3 anos·discuss
The "I don't trust Signal" articles were one of the things that inspired me to push for making xxm first over other apps. Since then a few other options have also sprung up (Session, cwtch, simplex to name a few).

Also, it wasn't mentioned in the articles, but another issue solved by us and many of these other messengers is use of a private keyboard instead of the vendor/isp ones that can spy on users.

Unfortunately, I learned the hard way that better privacy and security will not beat convenience and network effects when you are competing with "free", so we are changing our approach.
rcarback
·há 3 anos·discuss
I think you are being too deferential here.

Reports from 2007/2008 had already indicated significant interference and government spying between agencies and with private corporations. Also, at that time it was widely believed but not yet confirmed Dual_EC_DRBG was backdoored via NIST/NSA collaboration.

Many folks equate any US government money with NSA money, and did so especially around this time, which is likely why you made this mistake. Taking any US-backed government money, even at the time Signal took it, was and should be suspect.

IIRC Signal continued to take money even after Snowden. So it is a fair point and not at all idiotic, and the over-reaction after you agreed to correct the article is suspect.

I do think Signal needed that money to survive, and it probably was put to good use, but I would have acted differently and more transparently about how my use of that money was communicated to the public.