HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

rhavaei

no profile record

Submissions

Supabase MCP can leak your entire SQL database

generalanalysis.com
3 points·by rhavaei·ano passado·0 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by rhavaei·ano passado·0 comments

[untitled]

2 points·by rhavaei·ano passado·0 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by rhavaei·ano passado·0 comments

A comprehensive analysis of Llama4 safety in CBRN tasks vs. closed-source models [pdf]

generalanalysis.com
2 points·by rhavaei·ano passado·0 comments

LLM Robustness/Safety Benchmark

generalanalysis.com
2 points·by rhavaei·ano passado·0 comments

An Implementation of AutoDAN Turbo

colab.research.google.com
2 points·by rhavaei·ano passado·0 comments

Using Deepseek R1 to Break LLMs: Tree of Attacks

colab.research.google.com
7 points·by rhavaei·ano passado·0 comments

The Jailbreak Bible

generalanalysis.com
17 points·by rhavaei·ano passado·4 comments

Red-Teaming ChatGPT for Hallucinations – Code and Report

github.com
1 points·by rhavaei·ano passado·0 comments

Consistent Jailbreaking Method in o1, o3, and 4o

generalanalysis.com
8 points·by rhavaei·ano passado·17 comments

Jailbroken: Finding 50,000 Legal Hallucinations in GPT-4o with RL

generalanalysis.com
4 points·by rhavaei·ano passado·2 comments

comments

rhavaei
·ano passado·discuss
Stay safe out there kids.
rhavaei
·ano passado·discuss
I have been working on a project for a few months now coding up different methodologies for LLM Jailbreaking. The idea was to stress-test how safe the new LLMs in production are and how easy is is to trick them. I have seen some pretty cool results with some of the methods like TAP (Tree of Attacks) so I wanted to share this here. Here is the github link: https://github.com/General-Analysis/GA
rhavaei
·ano passado·discuss
Codebase on https://github.com/General-Analysis/GA
rhavaei
·ano passado·discuss
Let’s go!
rhavaei
·ano passado·discuss
very nice blogpost.
rhavaei
·ano passado·discuss
good idea. Will do.
rhavaei
·ano passado·discuss
While this is generally correct, we prefer to look at this probabilistically. Do you think the expected number of harmful behaviors would stay the same if anyone could break these safety guardrails? Even if most users are could get this kind of info elsewhere, a small percentage of malicious ones can have an outsized impact. Some of the data we’ve seen—like bomb-making instructions—is highly detailed and convincing, making it far more accessible than just a random Google search. Removing safeguards doesn’t create masterminds, but it does lower the barrier for harm.
rhavaei
·ano passado·discuss
You will see it soon. We thought it may be harmful to publish it before it is patched. Especially because you can basically bypass all the safeguards with it.
rhavaei
·ano passado·discuss
We understand this. The issue is that it can be very harmful for us to share the method. We made the blogpost for it to be dated on when we found it. We will publish the method once it is patched to a reasonable degree.
rhavaei
·ano passado·discuss
Yes the data is available on our github https://github.com/General-Analysis/GA