HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

smcnc

no profile record

Submissions

[untitled]

1 points·by smcnc·há 2 meses·0 comments

comments

smcnc
·há 3 meses·discuss
One thing I noticed on the CS PhD side of the house is because many researchers don't want others to easily build upon their work (for whatever reasons), they don't often release the source code/data required to quickly validate it. This is a recipe for shortcuts, errors, and even in the worst cases, fraud.
smcnc
·há 3 meses·discuss
We’re both #DudesForKamala
smcnc
·há 3 meses·discuss
I was merely responding to replies directed at me. But that is probably good advice. No opinion was ever changed online. :)
smcnc
·há 3 meses·discuss
“Flee and reside in hotels” not equal to relocate and continue mission. The major operational staff at these bases still work there. Support was relocated not fleeing.
smcnc
·há 3 meses·discuss
US soldiers get hotels when fleeing? Wtf lol
smcnc
·há 3 meses·discuss
[flagged]
smcnc
·há 3 meses·discuss
[flagged]
smcnc
·há 3 meses·discuss
US blew up C-130s stuck in sand. A few got shot up. Iranians on the ground got the brunt of the bullets, however.
smcnc
·há 3 meses·discuss
There’s a difference between occupation (where this wins) and deterrence (where they can’t attack your country). The latter was the primary objective.
smcnc
·há 3 meses·discuss
Define defeat here. I think everyone in this thread confuses actual defeat with indifference and political risk. If the US military could be defeated so easily America would cease to exist, no? It just loses interest and moves on. Nobody attacks the US because they would lose.
smcnc
·há 3 meses·discuss
This is now Vietnam with no boots on the ground or years of war? Wow! Thanks
smcnc
·há 3 meses·discuss
More leverage with less conventional firepower? Objectives of reducing conventional military threats and nuclear weapons seem less now, no?
smcnc
·há 3 meses·discuss
Uncertainty.
smcnc
·há 3 meses·discuss
> 90% destruction of military is meaningless if 10% can wreck havoc on the strait. The cost associated with eliminating that 10% was deemed too much. That is Iran’s “win”.
smcnc
·há 3 meses·discuss
Agree with same comment as above.

> This is true. 90% destruction of military is meaningless if 10% can wreck havoc on the strait. The cost associated with eliminating that 10% was deemed too much. That is Iran’s “win”.
smcnc
·há 3 meses·discuss
This is true. 90% destruction of military is meaningless if 10% can wreck havoc on the strait. The cost associated with eliminating that 10% was deemed too much. That is Iran’s “win”.
smcnc
·há 3 meses·discuss
Cost of insurance for ships did.
smcnc
·há 3 meses·discuss
Search and rescue. Yes, it takes assets. Correct.
smcnc
·há 3 meses·discuss
Insightful
smcnc
·há 3 meses·discuss
[flagged]