when they say co workers, whom do they mean? anyone in my company? some one whom i work with for 30 mins per week? some one with whom we work for 5 hours a day? some one whom i chat with through out the day as part of work?
>>They’re often more than twice as accurate.
which co worker is capable of being twice accurate than me in knowing about me.
So surprising, so magical and so flawed.
How do we destroy such bullshit analysis all over the internet.
Some where some normal person or even a smart person is going to read this and believe it to be true and is going to base this as source of his research and going to come up with a whole lot of new bullshit.
This concept of flawed non sense and noisy logic i think deserves its own word.
Any suggestions? How about SINFO ... any useful, meaningful info we can call as INFO and anything that is not useful or misleading or nonsense we can call it SINFO.
Because i think its a type of SIN to provide misleading information.
I am making 105K and i am not sure about happiness. I am happy some part of the day, then i am sleeping then i am working and then i am not happy for some reason for few mins and then i am happy again for some other reason. Sometimes mins are hours and some times day are days.
Is there anyone who is happy 24/7/365?
Why is there such measurement of happiness? When it cannot really be measured.
Some times when there is one kid playing with me i am happy and when some times there are 10 kids around me screaming i am not happy.
I think these days we really need a down vote and dislike buttons as i don't understand why money and time is being wasted into such misleading research efforts.
You can be happy with $0 and happy with $1,000,000. and also you can be not happy with $0 and not happy with $1,000,000.
It is the amount of time you are happy, and i don't think anyone on this planet can be happy 24/7/365.
The number of happy moments may be something that is measurable but that also cannot be tied to any other factor.
I think if the AI is built on top of such false big data then its just going to result into artificial stupidity.
>>They’re often more than twice as accurate.
which co worker is capable of being twice accurate than me in knowing about me.
So surprising, so magical and so flawed.
How do we destroy such bullshit analysis all over the internet.
Some where some normal person or even a smart person is going to read this and believe it to be true and is going to base this as source of his research and going to come up with a whole lot of new bullshit.
This concept of flawed non sense and noisy logic i think deserves its own word.
Any suggestions? How about SINFO ... any useful, meaningful info we can call as INFO and anything that is not useful or misleading or nonsense we can call it SINFO.
Because i think its a type of SIN to provide misleading information.