By mistake I uploaded the same picture twice, and while all vague, the descriptions and ”data” were wildly different.
E.g. first time I was an extrovert, second time introvert… About the only thing that stayed the same was ”heterosexual”, but that’s a statistically safe guess.
So, reading the documentation in the [repo](https://gitlab.opencode.de/bmi/opendesk/deployment/opendesk/...) it’s immediately made clear that you should use the Enterprise Edition for production use. (Since the German state is behind this, why not focus on totally free software for production use?)
But what really surprised me are statements like this in the README:
” Nextcloud Enterprise: openDesk uses the Nextcloud Enterprise to the build Nextcloud container image for oD EE. The Nextcloud EE codebase might contain EE exclusive (longterm support) security patches, plus the Guard app, that is not publicly available, while it is AGPL-3.0 licensed.
And
COOL Controller container image and Helm chart: Source code and chart are using Mozilla Public License Version 2.0, but the source code is not public. It is provided to customers upon request.
”
This, according with other paragraphs describing percentages of free and non-free code in certain components really makes me wonder…
How about doing this _instead_ of paying out to the creators? When you sign up, you choose which charity should get the payouts for your created content?
Maybe start with a searchable list of well-known charities, let users propose new as the site grows.
I think that might stem a lot of the potential abuse of the system to earn money, and it gives users a good feeling.
E.g. first time I was an extrovert, second time introvert… About the only thing that stayed the same was ”heterosexual”, but that’s a statistically safe guess.