Dynamic yield was practically pushed into AI. They never promoted doing AI but investors and clients liked it more. So they simply gave up and went with it.
This is Googles blueprint to eradicate apple. They want Web apps to dominate because they already have a standing there and apple has a large marketshare in native apps.
It is quite common that sql servers run just with a few accounts. Helpful audit logs on critical systems have a high cost. So technically it is not hard but practically it is.
Annoying and useless. These kind of popups have become so widespread that a regular internet user pretty much agrees to anything as soon as the pop up. Private mode users are being trolled for opting for privacy with this regulation.
It is unfair if a bridge loan is involved. If the preferred stakeholders have the chance they will remove the commons from the equation. In the end both sides take a risk with their shares and it is usually more meaningful to people with little money.
"You don't have to use it" is a very common statement when a part of the userbase battles feature creep, complexity or just bad decisions. And it is always a lie. Most projects are driven by collectives or passed to new maintainers, which naturally takes this choice away from you. Optional is never optional.
The linked RIIR post pretty much described 2016 the behaviour of people shown in this thread. It is hilarious that seeing the arguing for RIIR in this context.
Rewriting in some language is a matter of skill and preference. To even consider a rewrite there should be a rational reason, i.e. it is broken or can't work in the ecosystem.
For fun and learning you can do what you want, of course.
Side question: how interesting and flexible is algolia as a replacement of a custom solr setup? I don't like the HN search and never heard that it is in use for larger data sets.
I don't know the guy who is doing the commentary in the vid but he is already very convinced of mikes guilty. Is there a list of scenes without commentary? I'd like to see few of the with context of the whole game to get a clue.
This argument makes no sense. People throw away quads because they sense something or get scared. By a small fraction cards aren't the winning factor in poker.
Sorry I've just watched a random show with Mike Apostle on yt and I have to say - by this small sample - bullshit.
Assuming he cheats, I don't see how. He played dominating hands with very classic conservative playstyle, not unnecessarily asking for value. He made risky pre flop all ins. He bluffed loosing hands. All sort of stuff that happens in an average poker game. Not sure why I even watched him playing considering the awful article.
Basic human rights prevent people being jailed on sight. Some of them are criminals. Some of those rights are constantly challenged, yet no one questions their general value. Privacy, thus end to end encryption is a basic human right. There shouldn't be any reason to require proof of this. What we have here is simply the fear of the loss of an extremely powerful tool.
Wow. It is already a struggle to live through conflicts in an average company. Turning any conflict down early on is insane. Sounds like he is trying to built a brainwashed cult.
I think corp life is something that is extremely romanticized by public success stories and anecdotes from (occasional/incidental) winners. Everything suggests that you should be in check and control of the situation, but you are not. You are in the rat race and just reacting with your best effort. The suggestive stories contain a lot of lies or leave out the negativity. There is always the 1% that is crazy good, but we should compare to the 99% to stay sane. But they are unheard of.
Kill your idols and realize that we are the plebs that actually get shit done.
Personally I take too little risk myself. I am 40 now but I cannot imagine anymore how I can myself in a joyful working position. I have no fun in hunting new jobs, but getting out of the rat race and getting back into social life would bring way more opporturnities. Also I believe that I am not holding down my 1% potential, but the environment you are acting in.