Is the best way to currently prevent this is via full ssl?
Additionally, how can a site like Amazon.com run non-ssl protected pages and prevent mitm-ing? (e.g. http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00TYBBNAW/ doesn't redirect to https, but only when ordering, etc.)
The problem i have with their "neutral, lacking security" icon is that it does not indicate that anything is wrong when in fact there is. https:// should never have a neutral icon. it should be VALID or INVALID.
> Instances of the same path and name will overwrite each other, with the latest instance taking precedence. Instances of the same path but different names will add additional mappings.
> When sending cookies to a server, all cookies with a more specific path mapping should be sent before cookies with less specific path mappings. For example, a cookie "name1=foo" with a path mapping of "/" should be sent after a cookie "name1=foo2" with a path mapping of "/bar" if they are both to be sent.
> reduction in the required number of parking spaces per residence unit
Can you elaborate on how this helps people? It was my thinking that requiring a minimum of 1 space per bedroom would help things. Parking is already burdensome and very costly.
Additionally, how can a site like Amazon.com run non-ssl protected pages and prevent mitm-ing? (e.g. http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00TYBBNAW/ doesn't redirect to https, but only when ordering, etc.)