[untitled]
8 comments
it is irresponsible to promote this rhetoric
Actually this is due to the slightly "clickbaity" tile... If you had read the article you would easily find it is about:
1.) one of the many scientific studies showing the huge effects humans have on climate 2.) reforestation is an effective solution to reduce the human effects on climate
1.) one of the many scientific studies showing the huge effects humans have on climate 2.) reforestation is an effective solution to reduce the human effects on climate
How is this rhetoric?
It was always obvious that this is one of the solutions to the climate change.
At this point it should be considered unethical to have more than 1 child per household. I don't care if that's politically incorrect, it's basic math. The entire species needs to drop to below-replacement reproduction. No eugenics, genocide or war required, just stop acting like horndogs or get snipped for Pete's sake.
Population has increased a lot and would be interesting to map that upon global temperature.
However you look at things - humans DO affect the climate of this planet pure and simple.