Ask HN: What is the oldest image online in which the link is not broken?
I think there are amazon affiliate banner image links from the 90s that still display images, such has the 'buy a book' icon. How about google image logo links from 1998. I wonder if those still work.
136 comments
As far as images that a modern browser can display, JPEG was created in 1992 and GIF in 1987, so there isn't going to be much prior to that. HTTP and Gopher date back to 1991, so the oldest image online that still resides at its original location would be on an FTP server.
Here's one of the oldest I can find, with timestamp 1988-07-06 00:00:
ftp://ftp.sunet.se/mirror/archive/ftp.sunet.se/pub/pictures/anime-manga/UruseiYatsura/Images/mendo.gif
or via http:
http://ftp.sunet.se/mirror/archive/ftp.sunet.se/pub/pictures...
This is the oldest one I can find on nic.funet.fi, from 1991:
ftp://nic.funet.fi/pub/pics/comp/net/misc/dnesu.gif
They have mirrors of many of the old ftp servers of yore, so if there's an older image out there, that's the place to look:
http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/
Most of the other old FTP servers I remember (sunsite.unc.edu, ftp.simtel.net, ftp.uu.net) have long since shut down. The ftp server at ftp.sunet.se is one of the oldest still running. Perhaps someone else knows of an older one?
I tried to find a copy of lena.bmp/lena.tga/lena.pcx since those file formats pre-date GIF, but I came up empty.
Here's one of the oldest I can find, with timestamp 1988-07-06 00:00:
ftp://ftp.sunet.se/mirror/archive/ftp.sunet.se/pub/pictures/anime-manga/UruseiYatsura/Images/mendo.gif
or via http:
http://ftp.sunet.se/mirror/archive/ftp.sunet.se/pub/pictures...
This is the oldest one I can find on nic.funet.fi, from 1991:
ftp://nic.funet.fi/pub/pics/comp/net/misc/dnesu.gif
They have mirrors of many of the old ftp servers of yore, so if there's an older image out there, that's the place to look:
http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/
Most of the other old FTP servers I remember (sunsite.unc.edu, ftp.simtel.net, ftp.uu.net) have long since shut down. The ftp server at ftp.sunet.se is one of the oldest still running. Perhaps someone else knows of an older one?
I tried to find a copy of lena.bmp/lena.tga/lena.pcx since those file formats pre-date GIF, but I came up empty.
Of course one of the oldest images on the internet is of anime...
Lena (or Lenna, spelling varies) is not anime - it's a crop of a Playboy centerfold that has been a standard bitmapped reference image for decades. It's been used in literally hundreds, if not thousands of academic papers on image processing, as well as a variety of benchmarks, etc.: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenna
Are we looking at the same image? The one I clicked on in GP's message is an anime-looking person holding a sword. It doesn't look much like the picture on the Lenna wikipedia article you posted.
It's from Urusei Yatsura[1]. It indeed looks like a bunch of Anime stuff. Scans of animation cells and other ephemera. It would have taken awhile to download on a modem.
The HTTP header is reporting:
curl -I "http://ftp.sunet.se/mirror/archive/ftp.sunet.se/pub/pictures..." | grep Last-Modified
Last-Modified: Tue, 05 Jul 1988 22:00:00 GMT
But it's just forwarding the filesystem mtime.
There's no exif data for this image, which totally checks out because it predates the exif format.
[1]: https://uruseiyatsura.fandom.com/wiki/Main_Page
The HTTP header is reporting:
curl -I "http://ftp.sunet.se/mirror/archive/ftp.sunet.se/pub/pictures..." | grep Last-Modified
Last-Modified: Tue, 05 Jul 1988 22:00:00 GMT
But it's just forwarding the filesystem mtime.
There's no exif data for this image, which totally checks out because it predates the exif format.
[1]: https://uruseiyatsura.fandom.com/wiki/Main_Page
Lena is also mentioned in the last sentence.
These conversations happen so often on HN I wonder if there is some sort of working memory limit on the participants that rapidly removes context from the comment they're replying to:
> > > > > Here are some numbers: [6, 2, 34]
> > > > That's neat, one of them is prime
> > > 6 isn't prime, its factors are 2 and 3
> > Are we reading the same comment? There is a prime there
> 6 was mentioned there and it isn't prime
It's like some sort of weird comedy skit.
> > > > > Here are some numbers: [6, 2, 34]
> > > > That's neat, one of them is prime
> > > 6 isn't prime, its factors are 2 and 3
> > Are we reading the same comment? There is a prime there
> 6 was mentioned there and it isn't prime
It's like some sort of weird comedy skit.
I'd like to propose that we generalize this particular part of the conversation, and coin the term "XY Argument" (unless a name for it already exists?)
> > > > That's neat, one of them is prime
> > > 6 isn't prime, its factors are 2 and 3
I believe it's the equivalent of the [XY Problem], except in the context of an (imagined) disagreement. It happens because the second comment is misinterpreted to be arguing against the first when really it may be in addition. It can be fixed by readers taking a charitable interpretation of the second comment, or by the second commenter's author making it clear that they're not disagreeing, as in,
> > > Yes, and 6 isn't prime, its factors are 2 and 3
I'm pulling out these two comments because it's a much more common pattern than just this comment chain; I think it happens all the time with text in general. Actually, I'm commenting here because it just [happened to me] in a different context. Someone I thought I was arguing with turned out to mostly agree with me — but because we failed to re-affirm the parts of each other's arguments that we agreed with, it seemed like we disagreed more than we did.
[XY Problem]: https://xyproblem.info/
[happened to me]: https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/2565...
> > > > That's neat, one of them is prime
> > > 6 isn't prime, its factors are 2 and 3
I believe it's the equivalent of the [XY Problem], except in the context of an (imagined) disagreement. It happens because the second comment is misinterpreted to be arguing against the first when really it may be in addition. It can be fixed by readers taking a charitable interpretation of the second comment, or by the second commenter's author making it clear that they're not disagreeing, as in,
> > > Yes, and 6 isn't prime, its factors are 2 and 3
I'm pulling out these two comments because it's a much more common pattern than just this comment chain; I think it happens all the time with text in general. Actually, I'm commenting here because it just [happened to me] in a different context. Someone I thought I was arguing with turned out to mostly agree with me — but because we failed to re-affirm the parts of each other's arguments that we agreed with, it seemed like we disagreed more than we did.
[XY Problem]: https://xyproblem.info/
[happened to me]: https://github.com/streetcomplete/StreetComplete/issues/2565...
Third base!
Three is not an anime.
No. 6 definitely is an anime.
These conversations happen so often about anime I wonder if there is some sort of working memory limit on the participants that rapidly removes context from the comment they're replying to:
> > > > > Here are some waifus: [lenna, 6rem, natsuki]
> > > > That's neet, one of them is best girl
> > > lenna isn't from an anime, she exists irl
> > Are we reading the same comment? That's just your opinion, man
> 6rem is best spacing and material design is justice
It's like some sort of tone-deaf comedy skit.
> > > > > Here are some waifus: [lenna, 6rem, natsuki]
> > > > That's neet, one of them is best girl
> > > lenna isn't from an anime, she exists irl
> > Are we reading the same comment? That's just your opinion, man
> 6rem is best spacing and material design is justice
It's like some sort of tone-deaf comedy skit.
I've gotten enough upvotes here (4) that I feel I need to ~~ruin~~ explain the joke, lest HN get the idea that this is upvote-worthy in general.
This is low-effort humor. I took the comment above and replaced words with memes from anime, tech, and earlier in this conversation thread. There's no (intentionally) meaningful relation between rem and Rem, or the number 6, I was just pattern matching things that sounded similar. Basically the equivalent of an "I hardly know her" joke. Funny only for the meme value, and not what I come to HN for.
In this particular thread, ^^that^^ is the joke — that we mistake unrelated comments as meaningful replies.
This is low-effort humor. I took the comment above and replaced words with memes from anime, tech, and earlier in this conversation thread. There's no (intentionally) meaningful relation between rem and Rem, or the number 6, I was just pattern matching things that sounded similar. Basically the equivalent of an "I hardly know her" joke. Funny only for the meme value, and not what I come to HN for.
In this particular thread, ^^that^^ is the joke — that we mistake unrelated comments as meaningful replies.
I personally found the metajoke amusing, whether it was intended or not. The comment, low effort as it is is no different from the comment chain it describes. Great stuff.
No soap, radio.
I am thoroughly entertained.
That's Mendo Shutaro from Urusei Yatsura
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shutaro_Mendo
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shutaro_Mendo
> As far as images that a modern browser can display, JPEG was created in 1992 and GIF in 1987, so there isn't going to be much prior to that.
PBM is probably older than GIF and still has software support
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netpbm#File_formats
though apparently not directly in browsers! (I would have expected it did, but I couldn't get browsers to render PBM files directly.)
PBM is probably older than GIF and still has software support
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netpbm#File_formats
though apparently not directly in browsers! (I would have expected it did, but I couldn't get browsers to render PBM files directly.)
Netscape Navigator supported PBM (at least in some versions you could even write directly into a frame/window via JS in order to compose an image on the fly).
I completely forgot about that! I very vaguely remember experimenting with it, and I think I never got it to work. I can't find anything on it now, though.
Huh! So in that case, it could be that there's an old PBM file somewhere that could be a contender for this record.
I don't think mirrors or archives really count, in the spirit of OP's original question.
http://info.cern.ch/hypertext/DataSources/WWW/Servers.html
The list of all webservers used to fit on a single page, which might be a good starting point. However, at this point I believe anything still functioning might fit your definition of a "mirror" as few things still speak HTTP/0.9.
The list of all webservers used to fit on a single page, which might be a good starting point. However, at this point I believe anything still functioning might fit your definition of a "mirror" as few things still speak HTTP/0.9.
That's a great resource! Most of those links are no longer functioning, but I did find this image:
http://info.in2p3.fr./cc.gif
dated 30 Sept 1992, which is pretty old as far as the web goes.
http://info.in2p3.fr./cc.gif
dated 30 Sept 1992, which is pretty old as far as the web goes.
The original question was ambiguous; it said "online" but seemed to imply "on the world wide web". I'm not going to judge whether the links I provided count; I leave that decision to the OP.
I would agree that an archive ala archive.org should be disqualified, because few people would go to that site as the original. To me, Sunet is a little more grey, because while it is an archive/mirror site, many people used it and linked to it as if it were the primary source and not just an archive site. Before the web was indexed and search engines became popular, large mirror sites were the easiest way to access a variety of content, all in one place.
I would agree that an archive ala archive.org should be disqualified, because few people would go to that site as the original. To me, Sunet is a little more grey, because while it is an archive/mirror site, many people used it and linked to it as if it were the primary source and not just an archive site. Before the web was indexed and search engines became popular, large mirror sites were the easiest way to access a variety of content, all in one place.
This is sort of a special case. It's a matter of republishing
using the original file metadata and file contents, using the same domain but under a different path.
(Meaning the the current maintainers could fix this by doing a single "ln -s" command, ehrm. @ acc.umu.se.)
(Meaning the the current maintainers could fix this by doing a single "ln -s" command, ehrm. @ acc.umu.se.)
If your sole criterion is "file in original directory on hard drive still functioning after X years" then I doubt we're going to go back much further than the late 2000s
Not true. https://www.spacejam.com/ Has been up and unmodified since 1996.
Depends how you define unmodified. There's clearly a redirect for https there.
Anyway, a previous webmaster of this site replied another time it was posted here, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23709016 if anyone's curious.
Anyway, a previous webmaster of this site replied another time it was posted here, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23709016 if anyone's curious.
That is sad if 2000 is the last year.
[deleted]
Are we restricting format? Because queries like '"index of" pcx 1991' will reveal quite a bit (or TGA, TIFF, and PICT). Whether they've been up since the early 90s is another question.
I created a tool that will show you the images in the apache directory listings. Here's an example
http://9ol.es/apache-img.php?u=http://aries.ucsd.edu/ICONS/A...
These kinds of old icon libraries can be a good source for finding old sites. Here's more from that same domain
http://9ol.es/apache-img.php?u=http://aries.ucsd.edu/ICONS/I...
I used this technique to find an old icon set for the promotional page to some software of mine to give it a 1993 feel http://bootstra386.com
I Need to go back and finish that...
I created a tool that will show you the images in the apache directory listings. Here's an example
http://9ol.es/apache-img.php?u=http://aries.ucsd.edu/ICONS/A...
These kinds of old icon libraries can be a good source for finding old sites. Here's more from that same domain
http://9ol.es/apache-img.php?u=http://aries.ucsd.edu/ICONS/I...
I used this technique to find an old icon set for the promotional page to some software of mine to give it a 1993 feel http://bootstra386.com
I Need to go back and finish that...
I really appreciate the small details in that page... Such as using Date.getYear() instead of Date.getFullYear() to render the year in the guestbook, so the years are all 19121. Ha!
It's actually slightly more work to break things. Line 6:
https://github.com/kristopolous/BOOTSTRA.386/blob/master/hom...
Also the site totally works in Netscape Navigator 2.02 and renders nearly identical down to the pixel
Careful observers will note the Easter egg :)
I'll bring the Pentium 90 up if people want, I moved the main site to a raspberry pi just for power reasons
Edit: i brought it up. The link on the main page works. I'll probably not being back the twitch stream unless there's demand though
Edit 2: brought the ssh and telnet back up as well
Edit 3: The source for the image browser: http://9ol.es/pre.php?url=apache-img.php
https://github.com/kristopolous/BOOTSTRA.386/blob/master/hom...
Also the site totally works in Netscape Navigator 2.02 and renders nearly identical down to the pixel
Careful observers will note the Easter egg :)
I'll bring the Pentium 90 up if people want, I moved the main site to a raspberry pi just for power reasons
Edit: i brought it up. The link on the main page works. I'll probably not being back the twitch stream unless there's demand though
Edit 2: brought the ssh and telnet back up as well
Edit 3: The source for the image browser: http://9ol.es/pre.php?url=apache-img.php
Thanks for this nostalgia. It was so easy to browse web servers in the 90s.
http://9ol.es/beauty.php?url=/etc/passwd
http://9ol.es/beauty.php?url=/proc/version
http://9ol.es/beauty.php?url=/proc/uptime
Now it's time to put it offline.
http://9ol.es/beauty.php?url=/etc/passwd
http://9ol.es/beauty.php?url=/proc/version
http://9ol.es/beauty.php?url=/proc/uptime
Now it's time to put it offline.
it's cool. I leave machines completely open for people to create free accounts on.
So it's not something I actually care about, at all. I've actually used that tool to point to various system files doing exactly that strategy.
So feel free to create an account on the pentium 90, find my printers ip address and make it print me a message. I'll find it exciting and adorable.
edit: I looked at the log, looks like you guys are having fun poking around my system. I love the creativity. enjoy. Be sure to reply with any epic exploits. I'm genuinely excited to see what you find.
I just plugged in a webcam. See if you can snap a picture! I'll give 0.1LTC to the first paparazzi.
So it's not something I actually care about, at all. I've actually used that tool to point to various system files doing exactly that strategy.
So feel free to create an account on the pentium 90, find my printers ip address and make it print me a message. I'll find it exciting and adorable.
edit: I looked at the log, looks like you guys are having fun poking around my system. I love the creativity. enjoy. Be sure to reply with any epic exploits. I'm genuinely excited to see what you find.
I just plugged in a webcam. See if you can snap a picture! I'll give 0.1LTC to the first paparazzi.
I am going to do my damndnest to shoehorn BOOTSTRA/386 into a project at work. It's goddamned beautiful.
Sweet. I keep meaning to getting back to finishing my latest version and making the floppies but yeah, time management is a perennial challenge.
I used to schedule appointments with myself but it's so hard to keep up the act, sleeping in and doing nothing all day is so nice.
I used to schedule appointments with myself but it's so hard to keep up the act, sleeping in and doing nothing all day is so nice.
I guess we need to keep in mind that index of is going to report file creation date, and it's hard to know when the file actually entered the web vs. "Was created, someone left it on disk, and then started a web server."
I still have emails in my homedir from 1990. Ugh.
I still have emails in my homedir from 1990. Ugh.
Oldest I could come up with is a book cover image for a 1993 Japanese book about MS-DOS Kermit.
http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/msben_i.gif
Currently served with a Last-modified of 1994-12-07T02:42Z -- Archive.org's oldest capture (Dec 1996) includes the link.
https://web.archive.org/web/19961222213301/http://www.columb...
http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/msben_i.gif
Currently served with a Last-modified of 1994-12-07T02:42Z -- Archive.org's oldest capture (Dec 1996) includes the link.
https://web.archive.org/web/19961222213301/http://www.columb...
Another almost as old (archive.org copy from Nov 1996) but much more fun:
http://k12s.phast.umass.edu/images/Images.html
This is local copy of Anthony's WWW Images 1.8 released April 1996 by Anthony Thyssen. It was meant as a common set of common navigation icons for the web.
k12s.phast.umass.edu has been running continuously since late 1995. K12S was a spin off k12.oit.umass.edu (a free menu-based multi-user public access system for K-12 teachers and students). The S stood for SLiRP -- an open source SLIP/PPP emulator -- so they could offer emulated SLIP connections via the UMass modem-banks at no cost (local commercial SLIP accounts were $5.95/hr IIRC).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slirp
http://k12s.phast.umass.edu/images/Images.html
This is local copy of Anthony's WWW Images 1.8 released April 1996 by Anthony Thyssen. It was meant as a common set of common navigation icons for the web.
k12s.phast.umass.edu has been running continuously since late 1995. K12S was a spin off k12.oit.umass.edu (a free menu-based multi-user public access system for K-12 teachers and students). The S stood for SLiRP -- an open source SLIP/PPP emulator -- so they could offer emulated SLIP connections via the UMass modem-banks at no cost (local commercial SLIP accounts were $5.95/hr IIRC).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slirp
Wow, people were still using Kermit in 1993? By then I thought everything had moved to x/y/zmodem.
I actually owned that book circa 1996 and used Kermit in a production system transferring files via dialup between a manufacturing facility in Mexico and their US-based headquarters. It was incredibly fragile. No idea now why Kermit was chosen, but it was a horrible tool for the job.
I have a page, http://don.dream-in-color.net/books/ which has been continually updated since 1995. It's had some URL changes (it was originally served via FTP under a domain that I lost to missing a registration renewal back in 2004) and back-end technology changes (it was originally manually-updated HTML), but I was able to find a 1997 version of the page in the wayback archive: https://web.archive.org/web/19980121235911/http://quixote.co...
It definitely doesn't fit the bill of this thread (no images, not original links), but it's an interesting site nonetheless. I'm amazed at the number of books you've read over the years. I'm shooting for 3 books this year, and that's a 200% increase over last year!
Do you have good memory for the content of the books you've read? Or do some specific books stand out even over several years?
Do you have good memory for the content of the books you've read? Or do some specific books stand out even over several years?
> I'm shooting for 3 books this year, and that's a 200% increase over last year!
I mean... there's probably no point forcing yourself if you don't want to. People who read a lot of books, myself included, don't do it because we're diligent, we do it because we enjoy it.
There's nothing special about books. You might as well say "I am going to finish 3 video games this year" or "I am going to go fishing three times this year".
If the achieving of goals itself is what brings you enjoyment, then by all means, go for it.
I suppose there's also a case to be made for people who tend to not take enough time off and who need to set themselves goals for leisure time for that reason.
Anyways: Don't torture yourself.
I mean... there's probably no point forcing yourself if you don't want to. People who read a lot of books, myself included, don't do it because we're diligent, we do it because we enjoy it.
There's nothing special about books. You might as well say "I am going to finish 3 video games this year" or "I am going to go fishing three times this year".
If the achieving of goals itself is what brings you enjoyment, then by all means, go for it.
I suppose there's also a case to be made for people who tend to not take enough time off and who need to set themselves goals for leisure time for that reason.
Anyways: Don't torture yourself.
In the past, I have found it very difficult to get through books, but I’ve never had a problem with just putting it down when I’m not interested. I think that’s a big part of my situation: I have had trouble finding things that really hold my interest. And even for some books that I did find interesting, my low reading speed made the process drag on for too long for my interest to hold up. But no, I’m not tortured. I do appreciate your concern, however.
>I'm shooting for 3 books this year, and that's a 200% increase over last year!
I'm gonna countersignal the other guy who replied to you and tell you that this is great news. I have had years in my life when I have read 40+ books, and years where I have read none at all. Setting a goal to carve off time for reading is huge. There is something special about books, something no other form of media does in terms of engaging your brain as an active participant. It's good for you.
I'm gonna countersignal the other guy who replied to you and tell you that this is great news. I have had years in my life when I have read 40+ books, and years where I have read none at all. Setting a goal to carve off time for reading is huge. There is something special about books, something no other form of media does in terms of engaging your brain as an active participant. It's good for you.
I like reading books though I don't read nearly as many as I used to. It's one reason that I'm in the camp of going meh when people go on about needing free WiFi on flights. It's one of the few times I really unplug. OK, I watch videos and play games too but I don't actually miss being offline for 6-12 hours.
Having this list really helps to refresh my memory, but I do have an uncanny knack for remembering things I read. Perhaps the most notable case of this was that while taking a theology class in 1999, I was able to remember a passage in a book I'd read in 1993, but where in the book the passage was and could go to my bookshelves, pull down the volume and find the passage in about ten minutes. It's really handy when it comes to creative writing workshops in that I can often pull up a useful novel or story for a writer from my memory.
As for volume, a lot comes from what I prioritize. I don't watch much television (especially by American standards), and back when commuting was a thing, that was 60–90 minutes a day of reading time.
And, alas, I still fall victim to the buying more books than I can read trap (for a brief while I had the unread books down to a single IKEA Billy bookcase, but I fell off the wagon and now there are piles of books on most flat surfaces stacked with books that I intend to read.
As for volume, a lot comes from what I prioritize. I don't watch much television (especially by American standards), and back when commuting was a thing, that was 60–90 minutes a day of reading time.
And, alas, I still fall victim to the buying more books than I can read trap (for a brief while I had the unread books down to a single IKEA Billy bookcase, but I fell off the wagon and now there are piles of books on most flat surfaces stacked with books that I intend to read.
This was posted to the WWW by Tim Berners-Lee in 1992 and I think it's the original URL, though maybe not. Surely there must be an anonymous FTP site that has images that predates HTTP...
https://musiclub.web.cern.ch/bands/cernettes/pictures/LHC5.j...
https://musiclub.web.cern.ch/bands/cernettes/pictures/LHC5.j...
This says it's from 1994: https://musiclub.web.cern.ch/bands/cernettes/
And still I find the pictures astonishingly good for 1994..
And still I find the pictures astonishingly good for 1994..
EXIF data says that images was generated using Photoshop CS3, which was released in 2007.
Has the first photo on the www been lost?
Because I can't find it easily online.
"Berners-Lee made a webpage to advertise events taking place at CERN and uploaded Gennaro’s picture of the band. The image was tiny—only around 120 pixels by 50 pixels—because the early web would have struggled with larger images. It was about the size of a stamp".
Because I can't find it easily online.
"Berners-Lee made a webpage to advertise events taking place at CERN and uploaded Gennaro’s picture of the band. The image was tiny—only around 120 pixels by 50 pixels—because the early web would have struggled with larger images. It was about the size of a stamp".
And the HTML on that site says this:
<meta name="generator" content="Adobe GoLive 6">Nice detection!
> And still I find the pictures astonishingly good for 1994..
I guess it's probably a scanned print rather than an image from a digital cameras.
I guess it's probably a scanned print rather than an image from a digital cameras.
Yes, but it's not in "websafe" 216 colour or super compressed jpeg.
Fair point. I remember an earlyish web, but I guess 1994 is a little before my time (I was born in 1993).
Tangentially, JPEG was only two years old when that site was published!
[deleted]
[deleted]
https://www.spacejam.com/
This whole site from 1996 still works!
This whole site from 1996 still works!
Oh man, how our attention span and curiosity has changed. Can you imagine a sitemap like this, today: https://www.spacejam.com/cmp/sitemap.html ?
It's glorious!
It's glorious!
Probably a wasted effort back then, too, to be fair.
> "Never on the Internet have so few worked so hard to bring you so much in so little time."
Gotta love the editorializing right there.
Gotta love the editorializing right there.
They must be continuing to update this as in 1996 it wouldn't have had links to Privacy Policy pages on WB's current website. I think that makes it even cooler as they are actively maintaining it in its historic form.
In the earliest (December) 1996 version that Archive.org has, the site has an initial landing page you have to click through before you arrive at something similar to the homepage today:
https://web.archive.org/web/19970124032137/http://www.spacej...
https://web.archive.org/web/19970124032137/http://www.spacej...
https://www.rollingstone.com/movies/movie-news/space-jam-for...
There are a group of fans who've kept it up and updated....
There are a group of fans who've kept it up and updated....
I'm curious if they are going to leave it in its historic form or replace it for the upcoming sequel being released this summer.
I was wondering this, too, recently. spacejam2.com is kind of interesting in that they sell jams and also offer to sell the domain for a million dollars.
"You are welcome to buy our jam or you can also buy our website"
"You are welcome to buy our jam or you can also buy our website"
This is hilarious, thanks so much for sharing. Very funny halfway-legitimate approach to cybersquatting.
Thank you for sharing that. That's the most dedicated domain squatter I've ever seen.
The Cookie Settings link looks to be incorrect. I was curious what cookie settings would mean on a site from 1996.
It's so fast!
The answer is most likely an image hosted on an academic's personal site on a university server somewhere. Although how you would ever figure which is the actual oldest, I have no i idea.
As a college student, I helped create this site in, I believe, 1994: http://pynchon.pomona.edu/ I don't know that I really count as an academic, but I think the site has survived because it's sitting on a university server.
The image links still work.
The image links still work.
Unfortunately the mtimes on the images are all 1 Dec 2004. Probably the files all got copied without preserving timestamps.
Edit to add: Sorry, firefox misled me by showing the mtime of the html page when I asked for image info. The images are from 3 Jan 2003.
Edit to add: Sorry, firefox misled me by showing the mtime of the html page when I asked for image info. The images are from 3 Jan 2003.
"Some of the initial work on this page was done by Penny Padgett."
That sounds like a Pynchon character...is she a real person or did Pynchon help you make this site?
That sounds like a Pynchon character...is she a real person or did Pynchon help you make this site?
I like the idea of some extremely tired 486 hooked up to a thinnet cable in some storage closet still serving up pages off of their Slackware Linux 1.1 install using CERN httpd. Nobody wants to turn it off because they know the hard drive will never spin up again if they do.
How about http://www.armory.com/, a geek house in Santa Cruz from the late 80s through the 90s? If you look at the list of images at http://www.armory.com/images/, you'll find http://www.armory.com/images/arm.gif with a creation date of 1994-02-10.
Heck, doing an `ls -la`, I have files on there that I have not modified since 1996.
R.I.P. John DuBois, founder of Armory http://www.armory.com/~spcecdt/
Heck, doing an `ls -la`, I have files on there that I have not modified since 1996.
R.I.P. John DuBois, founder of Armory http://www.armory.com/~spcecdt/
Still running the Spinner/Roxen web server, I see: http://www.armory.com/internal-roxen-roxen :)
That tiny Swedish company was my first employer 1997-2004. Fun times.
That tiny Swedish company was my first employer 1997-2004. Fun times.
Oldest I have, is a site I let a friend from IRC setup on my box.
http://l8r.net/amiga/
Lots of the images are from 1996:
amiga/images:
total 1112
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 12187 Nov 9 1996 amigactit.jpg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2252 Nov 9 1996 Amiga.gif
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 9282 Nov 9 1996 BlueBack.gif
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 45784 Nov 9 1996 IBrowseNowAnim.gif
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 18014 Nov 9 1996 JoshSuit1L.jpg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4880 Nov 9 1996 JoshSuit1LNail.jpg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 93300 Nov 9 1996 logo.jpg
http://l8r.net/amiga/
Lots of the images are from 1996:
amiga/images:
total 1112
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 12187 Nov 9 1996 amigactit.jpg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2252 Nov 9 1996 Amiga.gif
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 9282 Nov 9 1996 BlueBack.gif
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 45784 Nov 9 1996 IBrowseNowAnim.gif
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 18014 Nov 9 1996 JoshSuit1L.jpg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4880 Nov 9 1996 JoshSuit1LNail.jpg
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 93300 Nov 9 1996 logo.jpg
I just realised .. this site is probably older:
http://geraldholmes.freeyellow.com/
but in the mid-2000s, when I discovered it was dying, I restored it here by finding images on archive.org:
http://l8r.net/geraldholmes.freeyellow.com/
Not necessarily as per topic, but it was quite amusing at the time. Still a little funny now, at least to me.
http://geraldholmes.freeyellow.com/
but in the mid-2000s, when I discovered it was dying, I restored it here by finding images on archive.org:
http://l8r.net/geraldholmes.freeyellow.com/
Not necessarily as per topic, but it was quite amusing at the time. Still a little funny now, at least to me.
How do you like DEC? Think the microVAX has a future?
Shape is on twitter if you'd like to ask him: https://twitter.com/shapegsx
Fun fact: The amusement park from his 3rd most recent tweet burned to the ground a few days ago, suspiciously shortly after the company declared bankruptcy.
Fun fact: The amusement park from his 3rd most recent tweet burned to the ground a few days ago, suspiciously shortly after the company declared bankruptcy.
That's actually a buddy I knew on IRC, from 95/96 etc. Haven't seen / typed at him in 20+ years.
Do I have to be the oldest fart in the room to just naturally assume that since Mozilla was the first popular browser to show inline images, that its homepage is the first place to look?
http://home.mcom.com
Last-Modified: Fri, 21 Oct 1994 19:00:00 GMT
http://home.mcom.com
Last-Modified: Fri, 21 Oct 1994 19:00:00 GMT
NCSA Mosaic was the predecessor to Netscape and Mozilla, and I think was the first browser to offer inline images. I remember going to Interop in 1993 and everyone was blown away by the demo of Mosaic and its inline images showing O'Reilly's GNN (Global Network Navigator) site. Somewhere, I might still have an advertising card the O'Reilly folks were handing out about it. You can see more here (and yes, bizarrely, wood-cut-look icons were a big design fashion trend for a period in the early '90s. Sun's TOPS used them extensively, too...) https://www.oreilly.com/gnn/
That said, there were several earlier browsers that could opened image tags in another window or app - Viola, Cello, etc. (Even Lynx, which still exists for some bizarre reason...)
As hard as it will be for the younger crowd to believe, at that time every new web site on the Internet got posted to the NCSA "What's New" page, so people would know what all's out there!
That said, there were several earlier browsers that could opened image tags in another window or app - Viola, Cello, etc. (Even Lynx, which still exists for some bizarre reason...)
As hard as it will be for the younger crowd to believe, at that time every new web site on the Internet got posted to the NCSA "What's New" page, so people would know what all's out there!
It’s remotely possible oreilly.com has one of the oldest continually existing images... they already had a shelf or two of books when Navigator launched.
It's somehow comforting to see that image maps from 1994 still perform like absolute crap in 2021. It's just an extra bit of authenticity.
> image maps from 1994 still perform like absolute crap in 2021
I don't follow. Are you referring to the progressive GIF rendering? It seems to be working beautifully and as intended. It's a 40K GIF that downloads at 5K/s, presumably because of limited server-side throughput (artificial or real). If you just open it locally or host it somewhere else it renders instantaneously, without any hint of its progressive encoding.
Or maybe that's what you were referring to--the possibly deliberate uplink throttling--and we just have different opinions about what's "beautiful".
I'm curious if anyone has written a JavaScript library that emulates the browser rendering experience of 1990s modem links. That'd be cool, both from an implementation standpoint as well as viewing experience.
I don't follow. Are you referring to the progressive GIF rendering? It seems to be working beautifully and as intended. It's a 40K GIF that downloads at 5K/s, presumably because of limited server-side throughput (artificial or real). If you just open it locally or host it somewhere else it renders instantaneously, without any hint of its progressive encoding.
Or maybe that's what you were referring to--the possibly deliberate uplink throttling--and we just have different opinions about what's "beautiful".
I'm curious if anyone has written a JavaScript library that emulates the browser rendering experience of 1990s modem links. That'd be cool, both from an implementation standpoint as well as viewing experience.
No, he is referring to the image map on that site. Although it worked fine for me. Here's an appropriately old school reference: https://cmd.inp.nsk.su/old/cmd2/manuals/web/using_cgi/ch9.ht...
There is always an older fart.
Netscape Navigator was the second popular web browser to show images.
Problem is that the first one changed their domain name since then, from ncsa.uiuc.edu to ncsa.illinois.edu, so unless there’s some obscure little server still running, those are gone.
You’re going to want to look for one of the pilot sites of the internet, but find one that’s been continuously operational. The original CERN site went away.
Netscape Navigator was the second popular web browser to show images.
Problem is that the first one changed their domain name since then, from ncsa.uiuc.edu to ncsa.illinois.edu, so unless there’s some obscure little server still running, those are gone.
You’re going to want to look for one of the pilot sites of the internet, but find one that’s been continuously operational. The original CERN site went away.
Cello added support for the img tag in 1993, before Netscape was ever released. At that point in time, I recall it was the second most popular GUI browser, behind NCSA Mosaic.
Welcome, older fart!
Cello lost to Mosaic, Mosaic lost to Navigator, humanity lost to IE, then IE lost to Firefox, Firefox lost to webkit, and now on HN we hand-wring about whether humanity is losing to Google or not.
I have had many, many conversations about the "Browser Wars" over the years and it's like talking about cross-border rivalries in the Midwest. Nobody can quite agree on who is the best or worst. Most people can't even agree about who was actually involved (is Ohio in the Midwest? People in Ohio say yes. People in the Mississippi River Valley say no).
Everybody who is anybody agrees that they all hate IE/Iowa.
I was trying to put together some timelines at one point and was reading biographies about Spyglass. Do you remember Spyglass? According to the founder, the Browser Wars were Spyglass versus IE (or was it Navigator?), and Spyglass won.
Why? Because he was only thinking about corporate computers. That was the universe to him. Places that we all know were barely on the Internet, he felt was "The Browser War".
I thought the first browser war was Mosaic vs Netscape, but as many think the IMG tag is the first real salvo in the war, Cello vs Mosaic is probably the first war, IE vs Netscape being #3.
Cello lost to Mosaic, Mosaic lost to Navigator, humanity lost to IE, then IE lost to Firefox, Firefox lost to webkit, and now on HN we hand-wring about whether humanity is losing to Google or not.
I have had many, many conversations about the "Browser Wars" over the years and it's like talking about cross-border rivalries in the Midwest. Nobody can quite agree on who is the best or worst. Most people can't even agree about who was actually involved (is Ohio in the Midwest? People in Ohio say yes. People in the Mississippi River Valley say no).
Everybody who is anybody agrees that they all hate IE/Iowa.
I was trying to put together some timelines at one point and was reading biographies about Spyglass. Do you remember Spyglass? According to the founder, the Browser Wars were Spyglass versus IE (or was it Navigator?), and Spyglass won.
Why? Because he was only thinking about corporate computers. That was the universe to him. Places that we all know were barely on the Internet, he felt was "The Browser War".
I thought the first browser war was Mosaic vs Netscape, but as many think the IMG tag is the first real salvo in the war, Cello vs Mosaic is probably the first war, IE vs Netscape being #3.
Hello fellow old farts. I rememer browsing on Mosaic, Cello, Slipknot, Netscape, Arachne, Phoenix/Firefox. There were doubtless others I've forgotten.
Anybody remember the various 3D browsers that would visualize site relationships? Apple's Hotsauce was the first one I remember, though it was more of a text based meta browser. Then there were a few graphical windowing attmepts.
The first images I remember seeing on the internet were the Clementine lunar photos, slowly rendered line by line:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clementine_(spacecraft)
Anybody remember the various 3D browsers that would visualize site relationships? Apple's Hotsauce was the first one I remember, though it was more of a text based meta browser. Then there were a few graphical windowing attmepts.
The first images I remember seeing on the internet were the Clementine lunar photos, slowly rendered line by line:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clementine_(spacecraft)
Firefox really blew the early lead that they had. Fills me with immense sadness they went the Yahoo way.
The images from CS348B at Stanford in Winter 92 are still up:
http://graphics.stanford.edu/courses/cs348b-competition/cs34...
but I think everything on the site was actually posted sometime in 1994.
Unfortunately, the University of Utah recently deleted all alumni home directories and websites (I managed to save what I could). There were probably some fairly early pages up there.
http://graphics.stanford.edu/courses/cs348b-competition/cs34...
but I think everything on the site was actually posted sometime in 1994.
Unfortunately, the University of Utah recently deleted all alumni home directories and websites (I managed to save what I could). There were probably some fairly early pages up there.
The oldest images here are from September 1992:
https://jim.rees.org/apollo-archive/rogues-gallery/index.htm...
They were originally on an ftp server and became available on the web in 1993 at:
http://www.umich.edu/~archive/apollo/
https://jim.rees.org/apollo-archive/rogues-gallery/index.htm...
They were originally on an ftp server and became available on the web in 1993 at:
http://www.umich.edu/~archive/apollo/
One image that certainly isn't the oldest but might be one of the oldest important images that is still online at its original location is the Blue Ribbin Online Free Speech Campaign animated logo (https://www.eff.org/files/br.gif).
This image dates back to 1996 when the EFF launched a campaign against the Communication Decency Act (CDA). Many of the pages across the internet turned their background images black in protest of the CDA. What remains of the CDA is today known as "Section 230".
This image dates back to 1996 when the EFF launched a campaign against the Communication Decency Act (CDA). Many of the pages across the internet turned their background images black in protest of the CDA. What remains of the CDA is today known as "Section 230".
The religious cult Heaven's Gate has a website that's been maintained since at least the mid 90s. Some of the imagery on that site is pretty old.
https://www.heavensgate.com/
Edit: Though the cult's mass suicide in March '97 is well remembered, according to Wikipedia there are former members that maintain the website: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaven%27s_Gate_(religious_gro...
https://www.heavensgate.com/
Edit: Though the cult's mass suicide in March '97 is well remembered, according to Wikipedia there are former members that maintain the website: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaven%27s_Gate_(religious_gro...
"In the same month, the group purchased alien abduction insurance that would cover up to fifty members and would pay out $1 million per person (the policy covered abduction, impregnation, or death by aliens)"
Thank you for a new rabbit hole.
Thank you for a new rabbit hole.
I had never heard of Heaven's Gate. I just read (mostly skimmed through) some of the things in that website. It was quite horrible and dripping with morbidity (is using morbidity this way a correct nominalization?).
You want the oldest working image hyperlink?
Or just the oldest image that's at the same link? Maybe on Gopher?
For the oldest working image hyperlink, OJ's trial is up there with Space Jam. Like Space Jam the links are internal, but clickable images -
http://www.cnn.com/US/OJ/
Or just the oldest image that's at the same link? Maybe on Gopher?
For the oldest working image hyperlink, OJ's trial is up there with Space Jam. Like Space Jam the links are internal, but clickable images -
http://www.cnn.com/US/OJ/
[deleted]
https://missaonmaria.com
Specificially, note the Netscape Now! image: https://missaonmaria.com/img/netscape.gif
Interestinly enough, the Internet Archive has no record of the site.
Specificially, note the Netscape Now! image: https://missaonmaria.com/img/netscape.gif
Interestinly enough, the Internet Archive has no record of the site.
I'm very confused about the "NeoCities" image next to the IE and Netscape images. NeoCities is from 2013... Was there a different NeoCities that I'm not aware of?
NeoCities is a modern recreation of GeoCities.
Well, that's grim, it's a webpage about a missing person (Google Translate confirms).
I wonder how that got resolved, 24 and a third of a year later..
I wonder how that got resolved, 24 and a third of a year later..
Pretty sure it’s actually a musician’s promotional page and it seems it might be from 2020!
How do you make these 2 conclusions?
The page actually contains modern things like references to Google Analytics and Apple meta tags, but that could be because the archival tool keeps modernizing the site.
Edit: ok, looking for "Maria Korhosen katoamistapau" gives results from Amazon music and YouTube... looking for the person's name got me nowhere.
The page actually contains modern things like references to Google Analytics and Apple meta tags, but that could be because the archival tool keeps modernizing the site.
Edit: ok, looking for "Maria Korhosen katoamistapau" gives results from Amazon music and YouTube... looking for the person's name got me nowhere.
I'm sure it's not the oldest but this one is an interesting time capsule:
https://www.spacejam.com/
Also here, I don't think there's an image but this is the first website:
http://info.cern.ch/
https://www.spacejam.com/
Also here, I don't think there's an image but this is the first website:
http://info.cern.ch/
Unfortunate that the links to the code for this no longer exist... http://info.cern.ch/hypertext/WWW/Daemon/Oracle/Overview.htm...
I'd have thought the old green W3 logo or one of the various CERN ones would still be at their original locations - but apparently not!
The first thing this made me think of is the Astronomy Picture of the Day blog. Their first entry is on June 16, 1995 and they've been updating it ever since:
https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap950616.html
I was hoping there might be something on:
http://info.cern.ch/hypertext/WWW/TheProject.html
But alas, support for images hadn't been invented yet.
But alas, support for images hadn't been invented yet.
WWW the project 1992
http://info.cern.ch/hypertext/WWW/TheProject.html
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_websites_founded_befor...
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_websites_founded_befor...
I don't know what you'd consider a link. The web only came into being around 1993 or so.
In academia, it's not uncommon for me to come across FTP directories with files that have been sitting there since the early 1990s.
In academia, it's not uncommon for me to come across FTP directories with files that have been sitting there since the early 1990s.
"online"? That would be something on a newsgroup, BBS, usenet or public FTP. It wouldn't be something served over HTTP.
This is my 1995 website: http://www.netpoint.be
The oldest image I could find on w3.org dates back to 19 Nov 1994: https://www.w3.org/Icons/32x32/warning
The W3 consortium itself was only a month old at the time.
The W3 consortium itself was only a month old at the time.
The old MIT leglab website is still live and hosted by csail. Wayback machine has oldest capture back in 1996. I checked a few of the images of the older robots and wayback machine shows the links were unchanged since96. http://www.ai.mit.edu/projects/leglab/
https://web.archive.org/web/20210126053221/http://www.ai.mit...
Are we going to DDoS a historical vestige?
Space Jam's website from originally 1996 is still up: https://www.spacejam.com/
Michigan State University just finally (last year, maybe the year before) killed my personal site I had set up when I was a student in 1994. It had one picture on it.
[deleted]
Obviously archive.org links do not count. We have this but it redirects: https://www.google.com/google.jpg
There’s Usenet archives going back to at least 1990. I’d search those for image urls, then find ones that still work.
I just checked and sumex-aim.stanford.edu isn’t a host anymore :(
I always try to put some context behind questions like this. I would mention why I'm interested to know or why I need that.
What's the oldest MP3 file still online?
probably goatse dot cx, but I'm not checking
A resident of the Christmas Islands complained about goatse.cx some time ago and so it was shut down. Wikipedia says 1999-2004.