China got criticized because people are a) stupid b) irrational c) mostly religious and thus come with those indoctrinations. China wouldn't have started this if there was no good reason for it
Our economic systems do not support that solution, and I'd bet my life on it this will never happen. In theory a lot of things are fine, reality is ugly, very ugly.
You're aware of rising poverty levels in the FIRST world? Besides you can't fix distribution caused poverty, there will never be a frikking oasis of societal beauty in the heart of the Sahara.
There are so many issues with this comment (I appreciate it though, wish we could have a full conversation about this).
a) If you'd do some research you'd see that "100y ago" actually was often times better b) Getting off this planet? To where? Colonize Mars? To do what exactly? The category to that jeopardy answer is: Things that won't happen for 200
that's literally "ad hominem" & what kind of answer you want to hear now? a) yes I wish too b) lucky me ? in either case it doesn't provide any good points to a solution
Which will never happen because that'd go against capitalism. Even in the western world the majority of people lives in bad conditions. You really think you can improve the living standards for 90%+ of the world population?
It's not about space but resources, look at the world, you been around? the vast majority already lives in daily misery and it won't get better, if it continues like this we'll see some humanitarian catastrophe one rather wish not to think about.
So? I wouldn't have kids, putting kids in this world seems like one of the most egoistical and damaging things one can do. I'd volunteer for a vasectomy (if freely provided by the gov)
Can't understand how people still deny that there are simply way too many humans on this planet. We need population control asap otherwise this will only end up in the worst humanitarian and ecological catastrophe ever imagined.
Edit: Love the downvotes, where is this anthropocentric bias coming from? it's absolutely illogical and irrational, look at the situation neutral, replace humans with another species, we kill certain animals if they overpopulate areas and cause other species harm, so how are we any different? your cognitive dissonance most likely only stems from society's norms or religiously induced moral standards
I am not even that frugal, I live reasonable, but I spend lot of money on sport equipment, obviously I am not driving a Maserati or live in a Villa with pool, but neither do I live like a monk or live in hostel dorms, my luxury is that a) I don't have to work b) if I work I do what I enjoy and as many hours as I wish (which is probably the best of it) c) I can go wherever I want whenever I want.
I live with 500-700Eur/month since multiple years and I live a life of luxury compared to most others (and with that I mean my friends from Western Europe) and that includes traveling. So that'd be about 25-30 years which I'd call enough for retirement.
Don't forget: it's not like you'll never work again...honestly who wants to not work the next 30 years? there will always be some small jobs or part time projects which will produce some sort of income, even if not monetary
1200 core k8s cluster + 1.5PB ceph (shared nodes to some degree)
no issues with persistent disks etc, only "annoying" thing is to figure out RBAC initially
you just use a storagecontroller, then its no work whatsoever, ceph does the rest
What kind of noob "data consultant" must you be if you didn't know years ago you can opt-out of most of the google stuff? Google allows to deactivate/delete (we dont know if they do but at least its offered) most of the stuff he wrote about. Facebook is its own story, but then again..his own fault for using and pushing data up there