> the path of least resistance is very different in the US, Europe and Asia
My theory is that in US compared to Europe, you are going to need the path of least resistance more often. If you are working two part-time jobs with variable hours and schedules to make ends meet, then you are going to reach for the easy & fast food options. Whereas if you have the stability of 40 hour work weeks, regular schedule and social safety nets - regardless of the total income - then you have the time and mental energy to eat healthier.
This seems more interesting, as it's not a code for a physical address but a lookup key for one.
You can update your code to point to a new address when you move:
> Their digital addresses will not change even if their physical addresses change. Their new addresses will be linked to the codes if they submit notices of address changes.
> later investors effectively collude with founders
> a small startup that never found product-market fit. The economy was bad, and they were running out of money, and they took - as I understood it - a dubious Series B led by a dubious investor
The unfortunate reality is that if a startup cannot survive for long on its own, the economy is bad, and investment interest is low - then past invested effort from founders and employees and money from early investors is a sunk cost. They have together created something with almost no independent economic value.
The later investors can buy the assets created so far at near zero cost (the alternative is a bankruptcy auction). They can reasonably argue that the future value of the business is all from their investment, together with a deal to hire the founders and current employees to invest future effort into it.
> Theoretically it should be possible to do that using two cameras connected to some kind of image processing unit
That "some kind of image processing unit" in humans has an awful lot of compute power and software.
If you remove $100k of sensors but have to add $200k of compute to run more advanced computer vision software, then it's a bad tradeoff to use only cameras, even if in theory that software is possible.
This is probably a question about classic CRDTs as much as eg-walker:
Do all possible topological sorts of the event graph result in the same final consensus document? If yes how do we know that, and if no, how do they resolve the order in which each branch is applied?
> Overall I've taken eight weeks throughout the year and never been questioned with it.
If you have taken eight weeks of vacation per year, and have not even seen push-back on it, you are definitely on "unlimited" compared to most of the world.
> If I could give my employees a $50k cash bonus and it got taxed at 24% or I could gift them a $50k car "for testing" and it was tax free, everyone would be getting paid in cars.
Belgium has exactly that (use of a car is tax-free) and as a result company cars are wildly popular. Getting rid of this tax loophole has been unpopular, but as a compromise they will only apply it to electric cars in the future.
> Was the backdoor used on obscure build servers or obscure pieces of build infrastructure somewhere?
And developer machines. The backdoor was live for ~1 month on testing releases of Debian and Fedora, which are likely to be used by developers. Their computers can be scraped for passwords, access keys and API credentials for the next attack.