The set of all possible "Gods" includes deities who punish worship, who lie to their worshippers, who are completely two-faced in their dealings with mortals, who have completely random intentional urgings, who put everyone through the torture of infinite fractal realities, and/or anything else that throws the wrench in trying to rationally deduce the "goodness" of "God".
This is also compared with the possibility that humans are faggots who will talk about absolute bullshit to make themselves feel better. No offense to gay people but I'm talking about the mass of humanity that seeks to "feel" more using ass-backwards strategies because they trust their idiotic culture too much.
I'd prefer to remain silent until overwhelming proof forces me to consider "a being of superior influence on this reality who resides outside of visible reality". It could definitely exist (along with the things from the set of known unknowns and unknown unknowns). But I'm betting more on humans being faggots.
It doesn't pay to please all people all of the time.
It pays to please some people some of the time.
As with a number of other tools and strategies, you have to leverage it at the right moment, the right rhythm. If you don't have an intuitionistic idea of the ratio between truth and small lies that are necessary to functioning...I'd probably stick to simplistic non-anticipatory models until you get a better idea of how people work.
People don't talk to exchange truth about the world, they talk mostly to repeat signals at a constant rhythm which sends a larger signal of "confidence" or "competency" or "trustworthiness" or even "this person is safe and stable to be around".
Yeah, there's a cognitive cost to anticipating other minds unless you're blessed with some capacity that is never stressed. There's also a cognitive cost to maintaining executive function without being swallowed by groupthink.
>people pleasing is selfish and manipulative
Your entire edifice of actions is the selfish and manipulative desires of your morality to instantiate itself in real space.
It doesn't pay to please all people all of the time.
It pays to please some people some of the time.
As with a number of other tools and strategies, you have to leverage it at the right moment, the right rhythm. If you don't have an intuitionistic idea of the ratio between truth and small lies that are necessary to functioning. People don't talk to exchange truth about the world, they talk mostly to repeat signals at a constant rhythm which sends a larger signal of "confidence" or "competency" or "trustworthiness" or even "this person is safe and stable to be around".
Yeah, there's a cognitive cost to anticipating other minds unless you're blessed with some capacity that is never stressed. There's also a cognitive cost to maintaining executive function without being swallowed by groupthink.
>people pleasing is selfish and manipulative
Your entire edifice of actions is the selfish and manipulative desires of your morality to instantiate itself in real space.
This is also compared with the possibility that humans are faggots who will talk about absolute bullshit to make themselves feel better. No offense to gay people but I'm talking about the mass of humanity that seeks to "feel" more using ass-backwards strategies because they trust their idiotic culture too much.
I'd prefer to remain silent until overwhelming proof forces me to consider "a being of superior influence on this reality who resides outside of visible reality". It could definitely exist (along with the things from the set of known unknowns and unknown unknowns). But I'm betting more on humans being faggots.