Uruky sounds like the google that we used to have: one that's just good because it returns relevant results, not because of ecosystem lock-in.
That being said, can't help noticing the [NO-AI] at the beginning of the post, and I wonder whether it would help adaption if you also make the search engine available to agents for paid customers.
A email thread, to me, is much preferable to any IM, unless participants knows to send those IMs in a thread as well.
All the context are in there in the rawest of forms, you a run through them with your eyeballs or have your tools do the summarisation there and then. Most of the IMs I received didn't even quote the original message they were responding to, and I end up spending time jumping up and down the channel or group to get the whole context. Not to mention folks sending me link to a slack, which, depending on the mood of the almighty slack god, can or cannot be opened in the app / current slack session.
That’s fantastic. In your opinion what are some of the best books / resources you use to have this kind of understanding of LLM and the underlying deep learning algorithm?
I’m building a on-device AI App that supports a good variety of open-weight LLM Models. It’s mostly so that I can gain an intuition on what goes on when we do inferencing, but my longer term plan is
1. Support on-device RAG to allow chatting with your own documents on mobile offline
2. Support MCP on-device, taking advantage of information that’s (only) available on your phone, like calendar events, health data, etc. These shouldn’t need to be anywhere but on-device.
3. Allow on-device AI to use shortcuts(?)
I think most of the functionality are well served on desktop front with Ollama and LM Studio, but moving these functionality to mobile offers a great learning opportunity.
I think while technically they differ mostly only in terms of the training materials thrown into it, the outcome is that each model is good at something and bad at others, just like human being. Soon you'll need standardized tests and HR department to evaluate individual LLM performance. :)
Sigh. But honestly, it just felt like people getting used to China doing outrageous things like these to the point where it's no longer interesting for a comment.
I don’t know man. I mean, google indexes the open web to create a search engine and we all seem to be fine with it. I do draw the line that if you want to build a LLM, there’s the internet for you, train your own damn model and stop piggybacking on someone else’s, or in China’s case, at least don’t get caught.
Young children are obsessed about TikTok, even in Hong Kong, and parents are just too happy to let their kids melt in front of a mobile screen all day just to get some rest.
You're right that correlation does not equal causation, but it doesn't have to be for those folks to not care.
Having lived in Singapore, Hong Kong (current) and China, I can tell you that in Singapore's case, folks are aware that they live under a semi-dictatorship, that their government controls all media (radio, tv, everything is state-owned). But they always say "but I guess the government is doing a good job".
One has nothing to do with the other. The government can do a good job without the dictatorship, but it's the way folks rationalize their helplessness, their sense of lack of control over their fate.
This is also why we in Hong Kong ARE fighting against these kind of controls, probably in vein, but I for one do NOT want to resign in rationalizing for the government's over-control without a fight.
It looks like something that's implemented in China, and we don't have problem with Ice drivers spitefully taking out multiple spots. What we have problem with is Ice drivers parking in Tesla Charging Spots (and this applies to other EV spots as well), just because they need a space to park. This system would solve that problem pretty well.
I drive a BYD in Hong Kong and we see Tesla drivers taking up charging spots just because it's marked "EV only", but they can't use BYD chargers <shrug>
Audible has something similar: they require that you use up all your credits before cancellation is even possible, so that is obstacle #1. Then they ask for reason and sub-reason, and give you either a $20 coupon if you say the reason is because it's too expensive, or a 3 months praise on your account if you say you can't catch up to one book a month.
Pretty clever. But having to choose 6 books immediately at the point of cancellation sucks
Then maybe it should say "Disconnected from {wifi-name}, but we have not turned off wifi completely. This is done so that you can still airdrop and use hotspot and other features. If you want to completely disable wifi, 3D-press on the Wifi button and select {whatever that button is}"
That being said, can't help noticing the [NO-AI] at the beginning of the post, and I wonder whether it would help adaption if you also make the search engine available to agents for paid customers.