It would be good if Samsung browser were listed. It has about 10% market share of chromium browsers and is on version 136. It sticks to one version for months at a time and then jumps several versions. Going by historical data it's due for another jump soon.
Without being signed into an AppleID you cannot install free apps either.
And if you install then sign out, you're also blocked from updating the free apps.
I like this approach of building a template in Figma and CSS, and having customizations map across them. I like that you've stuck with fairly established components where the behavior is very established. It means you're less likely to alienate people who want different conventions.
> I’d love to hear your thoughts from your experience working with designers & component libraries.
I tried a different approach. I built a tool to export Figma designs to HTML and inline CSS.
It uses the REST API rather than the plugin API, so you don't need as many permissions to use it.
I put in some work to collapse `div`s together, so the HTML isn't div soup.
It scales from exporting a single button to a whole screen, but isn't smart enough to identify reusable components.
I had hoped it would give developers an initial output to aim for when porting designs to React. Ultimately though, it didn't get much traction with my colleagues and I've stopped working on it.
I prefer Linux (fedora with gnome) because it needs less tinkering out the box.
It's the basic things like not having to install third party utilities to have window centric window management (as opposed to app centric window management). Or being able to plug my Android phone in and be able to browse the files without additional utilities.
I still have Windows for multiplayer games (everything else is done on Linux). When I built this desktop, I had to buy a Windows 11 license. It wasn't free. My laptop's old license did not transfer.
OEMs have to pay Microsoft for Windows licenses on prebuilt Windows computers.
---
>>Why do they allow the Crap And Turds department to piss all over their work?
>Because Windows is a free-in-practice product and it needs/wants a revenue stream.
Windows is not free. It's because 2 revenue streams are better than one revenue stream. If your goal is to make money, why wouldn't you? (To answer my own question, it's short term thinking that will eventually drive people away from your product).
I think it depends on if you define a functional language as one that functional programs can be written in, or a language that can only write functional programs.
I often see JavaScript described as a functional language, so I think modern parlance leans towards the former.
I'd be interested to hear how you'd get the usability to be as good as an operating system designed to be used with a remote running apps designed to be run with a remote.
Having to use a mouse and keyboard is a pain point for me when I use my desktop on my TV from the couch. For the mouse I use the trackpad on a ps5 controller, so the mouse isn't so bad.
Possibly you could:
* Not require passwords for everyday operation of your computer
* Boot into some sort of launcher designed for televisions
* Have a fairly narrow set of apps and services that work well with your setup. For example I don't know how you'd use Netflix or Disney plus with a remote on Linux.
I read this as meaning you won't be logged into the instance the agent interacts with