HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

civodul

no profile record

Submissions

The Shepherd 1.0.0 released: the init system written in Scheme

gnu.org
19 points·by civodul·2 года назад·3 comments

comments

civodul
·6 месяцев назад·discuss
There are some relatively widespread WiFi chipsets for which free firmware is available:

https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/html_node/Hardware-Cons...

Unfortunately, it's hard to be sure when you buy a WiFi device whether it has the right chipset. Also, most laptops come with Intel WiFi, and that requires non-free firmware.
civodul
·6 месяцев назад·discuss
On the same topic, check out this how-to on software development with Guix from the Cookbook (author here):

https://guix.gnu.org/cookbook/en/html_node/Software-Developm...

The idea was to show that there are several "levels" to take advantage of Guix for development, where the `guix.scm` file in David Thompson's blog post is the first level.
civodul
·в прошлом году·discuss
Shameless plug but probably relevant in the context of supply chain security: https://programming-journal.org/2023/7/1/
civodul
·2 года назад·discuss
(Author here.) I'm biased but I do think that the blending between Guix and Shepherd is unique and supports a level of integration beyond what's usually achieved in distros.

The services-in-containers extension you mention is a good example of that: it is implemented on the distro side (in Guix) without any modification to the Shepherd itself. The good thing is that the distro is in a good position to determine how to set up that container since it knows about the package being run, its configuration, and so on.
civodul
·8 лет назад·discuss
Good to hear; I know of other GNU maintainers who feel the same, I don't think we're isolated. FWIW, Guix adopted the Contributor Covenant and it's worked great for us—our reaction to incidents is firm but it has never been "punitive" contrary to what RMS suggests.
civodul
·8 лет назад·discuss
As co-maintainer of GNU Guix, I want to point out that the views expressed in Richard Stallman's message are his and not those of the Guix maintainers.

In particular, by writing that codes of conduct are "punitive spirit", RMS shows a misunderstanding of how these texts came into existence.

More importantly, by writing that he disagrees with "making diversity a goal", RMS seems to deny the role we free software people play in the demographics of our communities.

Many of us in Guix (and I think I can speak for my fellow Guix co-maintainer here) believe that free software should empower everyone. As such, correcting the biases, conscious or not, that have led to the poor diversity of our communities, must be part of our mission.