devdude1337

16 дней назадdiscuss

It doesn’t make any sense. If you can build a business purely with LLMs, then it’s even easier to copy it. Producing much output fast was never valuable, but those Valley guys seem to run around like headless chicken on crack (wait does crack even work without having a head?)

devdude1337

21 день назадdiscuss

Why would anyone want to do that? Why not automate these tasks and let Claude handle everything on its own?

If the maintenance and implementation can be done by an LLM, I see no logical reason to keep a human employed for lower work.

devdude1337

29 дней назадdiscuss

There is much beauty in the C-code of the compiler.

devdude1337

2 месяца назадdiscuss

don'hurt me…

devdude1337

3 года назадdiscuss

Most C++-projects I dealt with are neither clean nor performant. I rather follow clean code to improve maintainability and get things done than to optimize for performance. It’s also easier to find bottlenecks in a well readable and testable code base than in a premature-optimized one. However it is true that the more abstractions and indirections used software gets slower. Also these examples are too basic to make a real-world suggestion: never assume sonething is slow in a large project because of indirection or something…always get a profiler involved and run tests with time requirements to identify and fix slow running parts of a program.

comments