Local LLMs is the only thing viable and probably the only thing it will remain once the hype dies down.
A smaller cheaper local model can delivery most the value for coding, while we still use some services for code review and security compliance.
Once the VC money runs out and they start to charge the real price, the C-level will have to impose budges or limits. The current pissing contest over who can expend the most tokens is both ridiculous and shortsighted
What worried me is that LLMs are becoming a crutches for overworked engineers. But instead of reducing the workload it has also increased the expectation and consequently more aggressive deadlines, making it all worst overall
Idk what is the goal here, but maybe some analysis with graph would be better, like who has the most territory or something like that? You also might need to disclosure how you got this data
Agreed! The problem is that some 'seniors' never cared to learn patterns in the first place. That’s a huge problem for frontend, where we have increasingly complex architectures and people with very little experience with design.
Even some principles aren't known. I always recommend the book Head First: Design Patterns. It's in Java, but the lessons can be applied in every language.
Unfortunately, we are in a 'post-knowledge' era... I don't know how we can keep things up at this pace.
I have been thinking on dropping Windows, that I use only for gaming, but the issue is that I got a Nvidia graphics card and didn't have time to check if the support for it in Linux got better
But after experiencing the new Windows 11 "always-online" model it might make me stick to AMD in the future
The only reason to push language requirements for PR, is to make it harder to obtain it, its politically driven