You are confusing who is the party that is injured--as many in this thread are. We are not talking about the consumer who buys a non-fairtrade t-shirt, when he would rather had a fairtrade one. It's about the t-shirt producers who is legitimately fairtrade but whose business is now in the shitter because of a lying AI.
If you'd read the wikipedia article, you'd know that actual research shows that Betteridge's law is not true. The majority of articles with a yes/no question in the heading, answer the question with yes in the body.
Only accepting bugs with a fix is not a solution. Because who is going to vet the patches? Are you going to accept a Chinese patch for some obscure security issue? This is how real security problems are introduced.
Just tried in chatGpt-4. It gives the correct output (5), along with a short explanations of the order of operations (which you probably need to know, if you're asking the question).
what they actually needed to do was fire most of the staff in every team, leaving behind the two people who actually had good domain knowledge, then allow them to collaborate with good engineering teams to build sensible processes and systems
Well duh...of course you'd want that. But it is not so easy is it? I'd also instantly fire half my staff and hire hard working geniuses instead. But that just isn't an option, unfortunately.
This is the reason I like SumatraPDF. It has an old-fashioned user interface, a rather limited set of features, but boy it opens fast. I wish there were more apps in that mold.
Great initiative. More professors should do this; write your own material suitable to teach a course, and make it freely available.
What I also like is that if you find errata, you have a place to send them, with a reasonable expectation that they will be picked up in a new version.