I feel like go-kit is quite antithetical to the Go mindset...it presents a lossy abstraction as a means of future-proofing against eventualities that will almost certainly never be encountered
to be honest it strikes me as the sort of library that excites intermediate developers who tend to over-architect
Why do people talk about the F35 program like it is in question? the US is committed, many NATO countries are committed...one way or another the F35 is going to play a major role in NATO deterrence models.
It's not just air forces that are committed...both the US and UK navies have new carriers for which the F35 is the only realistic future option
If there are bugs, they will have to be ironed out. The costs are insane, but developing a new competitor at this stage would be even more outrageous
Keep in mind that unlike Russia, NATO can deploy planes in volume, staff the support, keep a parts supply chain, keep training with them regardless of costs. People will compare the F35 to a Russian jet on a 1-1 basis but the reality is a Russian fighter has a lower chance of even being combat ready, and if it did, it would be outnumbered by NATO fighters probably 5-1. I question if the Russian air Force can even realistically secure it's own borders
If I am going to consider using something other than Slack, probably the only thing I would consider is a self-hosted open source solution to keep communication private (just having an on-prem closed solution would not be enough, I want to OWN the data, otherwise, I might as well go with the market leader).
Otherwise, why use Stride instead of Slack? Most people I know have already used Slack and require no training. They probably even have the mobile app installed already.
Stride just seems to be a me-too offering with no compelling reason to exist
This is different in my mind than the market for VCS interfaces...in the end I still own my git repo
I often try to get my interviewer to offer comments about standard libs etc...when it is clear that they also have never read the standard sort routine, they will usually want to move the discussion elsewhere rather than accept the reality of their own acumen
Currently I see a lot of companies that are hiring but few that really need people. This might sound contradictory but most large tech companies seem to have a policy of constantly interviewing and assessing candidates if only to prevent them from joining the competition. Or, it is a matter of adding a sixth person to a five person team...nice to have, but not critical. This process gets it's liquidity from the unbelievable churn in our industry.
I can tell on the other hand when a company needs people badly...one phone screen, a short onsite...offer. A company in desperate need to hire is also too busy to lose an entire day interviewing candidates that will most likely be rejected. I feel that the FANG companies are in fact probably overstaffed but are also subject to the same churn they are exploiting.
But hey, ultimately this abusive process persists because we allow it to, and 99% of the time your interviewer just wants a giant ego massage. I usually dedicate a little time telling my interviewer how brilliant they are...this is what they want so just give it to them
No, but combine cloud APIs, AI, and market consolidation and you will indeed see a reduction in the demand for code. I write much less code than I did ten years ago. I spend more time integrating others' code now than I do writing my own.
In ten years most industrial coders will probably be down to a hundred or so lines of new production code a year...it will be the DATA arcitects who are calling the architecture shots as it becomes clear that data architecture trmps code architecture
frankly the fact that Google boils your entire resume down to one quiz question is reflected in their product lineup...boring utilities and absolutely nothing new of value to me created in the last five years
Assuming this construction has also not resulted in reduction of quality-of-life for the community, then this is a good for homeowners as well; it is introducing more potential buyers.
My big concern with the Bay Area is the market for my house getting asphyxiated by a complete lack of liquidity in entry-level accommodation.
There are a bunch of new rental/lease projects happening in the Bay Area, I see them in some phase of construction everywhere.
to be honest it strikes me as the sort of library that excites intermediate developers who tend to over-architect