HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

pul

no profile record

Submissions

p99 0ms* Autocomplete

ruurtjan.com
2 points·by pul·18 дней назад·0 comments

P99 0ms* autocomplete for 240M domain names

ruurtjan.com
11 points·by pul·19 дней назад·1 comments

Show HN: Browse Internet Infrastructure

wirewiki.com
110 points·by pul·5 месяцев назад·21 comments

I've spent $25k on X ads as an indie dev

ruurtjan.com
4 points·by pul·7 месяцев назад·0 comments

comments

pul
·19 дней назад·discuss
Hi HN!

Ruurtjan here, founder of Wirewiki.com. I recently tried to get autocomplete as fast as I could. I'll be checking in here the rest of the day to answer any questions.

Also happy to hear any suggestions for Wirewiki.
pul
·4 месяца назад·discuss
I'm working on https://www.wirewiki.com.

A browsable map of internet infrastructure. Not just a collection of lookup tools, but it also interlinks results, so you can navigate linked assets as well. Think: DNS lookup -> SPF record -> mail provider's SPF record -> IP address details.
pul
·4 месяца назад·discuss
Mostly back up now, but one server still times out: https://www.wirewiki.com/domains/tn/dns-trace
pul
·5 месяцев назад·discuss
I launched Wirewiki yesterday and am working on it full-time by myself.

https://www.wirewiki.com

A browsable map of internet infrastructure.

Currently, it only hosts DNS-related data and tools, but I'm looking to add ASN, IP, registrar, CDN and hosting provider data.
pul
·5 месяцев назад·discuss
I don't think I'll make a CLI for this any time soon.

The main thing I bring to the table with Wirewiki is UX, and I don't feel like I could do that well in a CLI.
pul
·5 месяцев назад·discuss
It’s a wiki (loosely defined as an authoritative browsable graph / index) of everything that goes over the wire.
pul
·5 месяцев назад·discuss
You're right that it doesn't do the name Wirewiki justice yet. I've got so many things planned to add at some point, much more than just DNS. Check again in 2 years' time ;)

> The list of servers you're going to get with a naive scanning approach is not what you want.

Absolutely right. I'm doing uptime monitoring and a handful of checks (udp/tcp, nxdomain, dnssec, dns filtering) before listing them, but I feel like it could definitely be improved. Would love to talk! I'll send you an email.
pul
·5 месяцев назад·discuss
You're the second person in these comments who points out faux name server redundancy. Interesting. I hadn't considered it as a major theme, but I'll move it up the list a little.

> Authoritative drift.

This is why I query all authoritative name servers (as well as delegating name servers when querying NS records) in the DNS propagation tool. I haven't seen any other site do this. This feels like such an obvious thing to me, but somehow I'm the only one.
pul
·5 месяцев назад·discuss
Yes. Ultimately nearly any tool can be used for good can also be used nefariously.

Internet infrastructure data is inherently open. I'm just presenting it in a more useful way. So any motivated actor can access it regradless.

In any case, exposing your IP during these lookups is bad operational security for them. So I would assume they'd prefer not to use Wirewiki.

All that to say: I don't feel conflicted about making these tools.
pul
·5 месяцев назад·discuss
Those are really useful suggestions, thanks!

> 1) Include a link to dnsviz.net to check on the DNSSEC status of domains.

I use DNSViz all the time. They've done a great job of displaying the entire trail and helping debug DNSSEC issues. But it's a bit too detailed for my liking. I'm thinking about how I would add this to Wirewiki. What to show and hide by default, how to format it, etc. Adding something similar is pretty high on my list for Wirewiki.

> 2) Shared fate [...]

I do already show ASNs for A/AAAA records, but adding those to NS and MX addresses as well would be useful. I'm a bit hesitant to add more data to the overview, but a separate page that shows an analysis of shared name server resources could be useful indeed. I've added it to the list.

> 3) displaying whether a domain exists on popular block lists would be awesome.

Absolutely. Already on the list :)

> You could spend the rest of your life building this and never actually completing it, be careful!

Haha, I've already spent 5 years, and I don't mind to keep going as long as it's interesting and sustainable!
pul
·5 месяцев назад·discuss
There are a ton of online DNS tool sites, MxToolbox being one of the largest.

I like the idea of evolution (diversity + selection) applied here. Many people building it differently and letting the market decide what's most useful.

My take on this space is making it a browsable graph instead of 'just' a collection of lookup tools. The internet _is_ a graph, and it often makes sense to inspect linked resources (Domain name -> name server -> IP address, for example).

As for the longer-term vision, I'd like to make this graph as complete as possible. It now only has DNS-related tools, but adding ASNs, BGP data, hosting providers, etc. would make the existing tools more useful with every addition.
pul
·5 месяцев назад·discuss
Oh thanks!

Depends on how you prefer to learn, but here are a few suggestions.

I've heard good things about the Computer Networks book by Tanenbaum and Wetherall, but I haven't read it myself. Very broad and comprehensive. The most hardcore way would be to make reading RFCs your hobby. It can be tough to get through, but if you regularly take half an hour to do it, you'll learn so much. I've recently started a course at https://classes.pracnet.net/, which is good too.
pul
·5 месяцев назад·discuss
Also: ask me anything.