Hm, this might explain something. In old B&W videos people's impromptu speech seems much more eloquent than today. I wonder if the luxury of instant text communication has something to do with it.
It's like complaining that a Lamborghini sucks because the cupholders are hard to reach. I'm sure it would bother some people, but it's not really worth discussing, is it?
- The logo looks small and isolated from the rest of the page.
- The text in the navigation tabs looks strange, maybe it should be centered?
- The boxes with the slight shading are missing vertical borders, which looks unfinished.
- The circles with the prices are not ordered numerically, which was confusing at first glance. Also the text labels in the image are too small.
- The font size for the description paragraphs is too small; looks like fine print.
- The colors for the Buy/Learn buttons at the top are badly chosen; when I hover over one, it looks like they're both active or inactive since they're the same color. There should be four different colors or they should be identical.
- Not sure why "Required" was abbreviated to "Req'd" when adjacent cells have much more text.
I was wondering what subfield coined the label $\Pi_2$, specifically. I haven't looked much into the structure of propositions and proofs per se, and I'm curious about what can be said about it.
"Since is formally a for-all/there-exists ($\Pi_2$) statement of arithmetic, there is a principle that such a proof should be convertible to one without contradiction"
Where can I find more information about this sort of thing?
I was thinking about exactly this yesterday - so much of "media matter" is like junk food for the mind. I wondered if we could start an organic movement but for the content industry.
It took me a while to gain enough confidence to start thinking, "well I was ecstatic about this idea yesterday, so there must be something good here".
Now I try to remember specifically what excited me. Not as a bullet point, but as a vision. What was the cool task I imagined accomplishing? What was I thinking of when I felt like I had the right answer? Usually that's enough to get me back in the same state of mind.
But keep talking yourself out of ideas. That's the only way to get rid of bad ones. Just don't forget the good parts. Ideas evolve; let natural selection run its course.
"In retrospect I realize that in almost everything that we worked on together, we were both amateurs. In digital physics, neural networks, even parallel computing, we never really knew what we were doing. But the things that we studied were so new that no one else knew exactly what they were doing either. It was amateurs who made the progress."