This is a good point. I'm not in the target audience for McDonalds either, but even if I were and I really really liked McDonalds, it wouldn't make it any healthier or more substantial. I would still be better off eating something else.
The whole "Oh god, Zynga is morally and creatively bankrupt" line is at least 6 months old at this point (and for a company that's only 3 years old, that's a pretty long time).
So what is your point here... It doesn't matter how long ago something like that is said; does it have any merit? Also, I think the first time I heard that kind of observation was a lot earlier than 6 months ago, and I actually still hear it.
Great point. I hope there's another way of getting rid of anonymity than having us all have Facebook accounts, because that is a great value. Having your real name and ties which connect back to your social life can hopefully be achieved somehow else... albeit probably through other sorts of centralized profile stores which might have the same stigmas as Facebook with some people. I think the key is in having many options for where you can have your profile kept and what level of data is there. As long as a profile provider's minimum level of profile data is sufficient to do away with the amount of anonymity that is necessary for a service (say Quora), it becomes a matter of how accurate the profile data is, i.e., how easy is it to create a fake account on the profile service?
The problem is, in order to know that Quora is good enough to force you to use FB Connect even though you don't want to, you have to use FB Connect... I'm certain this slows their growth.
Much agree. I see how you want to have a unique url for each year. I think that's a cool idea too, though each time you slide I think it's fine if the url doesn't update. Maybe unique year urls are only for inbound links.
What's with the buddhist bent YC? What does it have to do with hacking or business? I realize intelligent minds are attracted to buddhism and hinduism, but it's still pretty off topic, in addition to the idea of reincarnation being offensive to the scientifically inclined. At least feed the hackers some serious philosophy. We're smarter than this.
While I find Rowe perfectly charming and don't agree that he's disingenuous about anything in the talk I do agree in general about people being indulgent with the "right" question appended at the end of every statement. I've noticed this in many forms ("right", "yeah", "eh", "okay", etc...) for years and have basically the same analysis of it, that it conditions for agreement and is a cheap tactic, even if the speaker is relatively unconscious of it. There must be a term for it in linguistics. Going to look it up.
Did you see the "Yummy Raspberries" demo on this site? It's a pretty exact... well, raspberries to raspberries comparison. Unless one or the other was poorly implemented it's the same demo on both sides, again with Flash outperforming.
I totally agree. I'm also all for discussion, but I think he makes a mistake when he tries to imply they are special at all and other people should "go for" them / are "free to use them". Some of these ideas have been around for ~10 years. I actually posted a comment at the link critiquing along these lines. He moderated the comment out. I don't blame him because the comment was pretty straightforward in calling him unoriginal. The original comment:
"""Yeah, I'm reading back now trying to figure if you're just being sarcastic or trolling. But I guess you must not be. Listen, most of those ideas, save the comment aggregation one as far as I know, have been around for ever and have in fact been done and have gone through iterations. I'd go down the list because there's something to say about all of them but I don't want to take the time. I'd just suggest that you use google. Maybe throw out a few things: erideshare.com ; 43things.com / weightwatchers (not a whole lot to do with game theory but that does sound smart); blogger.com is wsywg ; gastroporn as primary content hasn't (yet) worked in a big way despite being tried a few times (radar.net / other mobile photo sharing sites with food channels).; uservoice.com and it's competition. Coupon incentives are sleazy. It's important to have ideas and to talk about them. That's great. But you can't really say these are your original ideas. There's like, a lot of prior art on all of these. It almost seems like you're hoping in 10 or 15 years you can point girls to this blog post and be like "See, I just gave those guys my ideas back in 2010 cause that's what kind of a guy I am, and they did em. I'm the seed planter." or somesuch (crack inspired?) reattribution. It's probably not going to work. But hey - a piece of good advice that should shine through this critique (I hope): Just work on your own stuff. If you have good ideas show it. Do it. Anyone can write a few paragraphs about websites that are already way in existence and pretend like they just got something "off their chest"."""