HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

throwbadubadu

no profile record

comments

throwbadubadu
·2 года назад·discuss
> It should be impossible to survive from saved money? Wouldn't that mean that everybody has to work until they die?

Come on, it depends on the duration, and it is long stretch from parent poster's thought to your "cannot live of saved money" for some time (though would claim, the states that have/had this guaranteed by the state had it more right anyway, basic survivability for retire time should not depend on savings in modern society, only luxury).

I mean the opposite, what you seem to want, that you can live indefinitely off a certain amount of saved money, we all know cannot be similarly true for everybody?
throwbadubadu
·3 года назад·discuss
> "Our mission is to ensure that artificial general intelligence benefits all of humanity."

Ahhh now I get that, all humanity, exclude noone :D

> pointed to Altman’s aggressive fundraising efforts for a chips venture with autocratic regimes in the Middle East, which raised concerns about the use of AI to facilitate state surveillance and human rights abuses.
throwbadubadu
·3 года назад·discuss
> I don’t wanna say many words about prison and I have no great desire remembering this. It was slave labor at a chemical factory where my health was significantly ruined and where I 24/7 had a great time in a company of drug dealers, thieves, and killers..
throwbadubadu
·3 года назад·discuss
You complain about abbreviation of omnipresent keywords, but then allow function only two more letters? :D I think proofs well, syntax is overrated and it is all opinionated taste..

> Which one is more readable?

Not seeing any difference.