Fully agree. And this is actually a well known fact. People following the rules perfectly as seen as losers in business. You are expected to break the ice with a more personal non textbook approach and therefore showing you are "street smart".
I really believe that books should be mostly free and people should//would pay based on usefulness. I will gladly donate 200$ for a book that helped me. I would also never have bought that same book if it was 10$ to start with.
I'm able to hold any book online so as soon as I hear about a book I place a hold on it. They have most books even new ones and if not I can request it for free through all libraries in North California.
I stop by the library once a week and pick up all the holds of that week (typically 3-4). I love to have the physical medium around.
I typically renew my loans 2 or 3 times and as such I keep the books close to 3 months. It allows me to fully read the ones I find interesting and just go over quickly the ones I don't care about.
Once a month I bring back all the books I got.
And all of this is completely free. I love my local libraries and cannot believe it took me that long to find out about this wonderful service.
From now on I go out of my way to never buy a single book again and avoid all DRM and other nonsensical digital medias like that.
They are the ones selecting the "members" and they will have a huge influence on any updates or any controversial topic or potential fork.
Don't fool yourself, this whole thing has been carefully orchestrated to look like if it was an open community but it is very tightly controlled by Facebook and friends.
That's the way they marketed it. They know they had to do this little concession in order to get Libra to pick up so that people would repeat tirelessly that it's not controller by Facebook and therefore it's good.
But it's controlled by Facebook and friends and the influence they would get over any decision is absolutely huge
I'm crossing my fingers that this pseudo crypto money never takes off. Having Facebook control this would be so terrible and the proof that we didn't learn anything over the last couple months. Don't fool yourself even though they released a white paper and some pseudo decentralized schemes this is no different than a casino chip.
Unfortunately I feel like it might pick up and become a thing.
you put it better than I did in my initial post. They managed to hack that reward part of the brain with immediate interaction at the expense of deep meaningful work that require long periods of reflection before producing anything.
Congratulation to them. I think what they did is absolutely amazing and will be seen retrospectively as one of the biggest fads of history.
- They managed to disturb millions of worker to an attention-driven work culture in which everything needs to always be synchronous and immediate.
- They managed to change chat from a set of open protocols to a single closed app terribly written in JS.
- They managed to make a lot of people absolute convinced advocate of Slack so that a lot of hyped startups have now to use Slack de facto or risk mutiny and have people create Slack channels on behalf of the company without any oversight.
So yeah I don't blame them but I blame every company that falls for this. I'm convinced that we will see Slack retrospectively as something that destroyed productivity.
I will agree that Slack can be useful when used correctly but I never saw a place that used it without it becoming that "attention driven" growing monster.
Bolting is an ethical issue that is discussed at length in the climbing community.
The ethics are very strong in Yosemite and therefore there are almost no bolts and all the climbs are done using removable gear. (also called trad gear).
I'm also baffled that you compared a couple micro pieces of metal to the disruption that a road provides to the environment. Or even compared to skiing resorts, mountain bike trails etc. In my experience climbers are some of the most ecologically respectful people out there.
This is a lot of training and committed parents. I'm doing a lot of aid climbing myself and anyone could be good at aid climbing if enough training and commitment is put inside it.
Aid climbing is not jumaring though. It means you use tools to get up. Most of the time the face is blank and you still need to get up painfully and add all the protections to go up little by little (aid climbing leading). Sometimes for higher grades of aid climbing (C3,A4,A5) this is very scary as there is almost nothing to hold on and you are literally pulling on very small hooks that barely rest on the side of the rock.
In this specific case I'm pretty sure that the two adults took the leads and the girl followed jumaring behind.
This is a bet on the future price of the home. And a lot of simulations have shown that you will come ahead in stocks unless you are in an exceptional growing market and not moving for at least 5 years.
There is a huge lobby in society to convince you that owning a home is the way to go (banks, real estate agent, other homeowners and people repeating this nonsense all the time). Don't let this fool you and make the calculations before buying anything.
I'm here to watch all the comments about "child endangerment" which are coming straight from American helicopter parent culture.
I'm really shocked at how most parents want the safest environment possible for their child so they don't even get any challenge in their everyday life. I saw children with helmets walking in the street. I got snarky comments from people when I said I was hiking in the woods with my kids. ("This is irresponsible: what would happen if you got lost with your kids").
I want my kids to try things even if they might be dangerous from time to time. There is nothing great about living an ultra safe dull life.
WeWork is even taking it one level further. They still have close to thousands software engineers to build... Things though.