> Apps are not infected with NetNut. This is just Google abusing their monopoly position to hurt its competitors.
If apps ship with stealth backdoors to sell access to the user's internal residential network, that's malware. I doubt any users want app providers to sell access to their private file server and anything else on their local network.
It doesn't seem like monopoly abuse to exclude such malware from application stores, just like key loggers or apps intercepting other apps network traffic without the user being aware of it (say the banking app's network traffic and password entry).
Sorry, but most of us need to work to eat. This idea that our "value" is has nothing to do with the economy is an idea rooted in deep privilege, in the ability to say -- if I don't like my job, if I'm not employable, I can just retire, and the only problem will be figuring out how to live life afterwards.
This is a cached version from a Zhihu answer from China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation that was deleted a few minutes ago, so that's why I'm linking the cached version. Right click -> Translate to English on Chrome should work.
At the time, this was a debate around our family dining table with an old school mathematician who graduated in the 1940s who grew into the computing era and founded a school of computer science, and three offspring (myself included) studying maths and computer science arguing the case either side.
Pre pdf, printouts of the paper were on continuous paper and my memory is a lot of the exemplar map examples were included in the draft as an appendix, begging the question if anyone was seriously arguing they'd find errors by looking at them.
"What does a mathemantical proof mean when a machine writes it and a machine verifies it" was a reductive but unanswerable position.
Living anywhere near a quarry is no joke. There will be a lot more heavy trucks on the road, with drivers who care very little about covering and securing their loads and even less about your windshield.
That seems absolutely crazy to do. One could argue that the marginal cost to work for using a work laptop is zero and the work is still yours (still beyond the risk I’m willing to take). Using a company’s AI account is literally using the company’s resources for a personal project. There is no plausible case where they don’t own it.
Maybe in previous failed attempts that what the model landed on and they’re preemptively stopping it. Did they release the any info on the failed attempts?
Yes, but real writing is also unbounded in complexity. Unicode can't do everything or it would just be a general purpose vector graphics language. Traditionally, writing systems had to adapt to the limitations of the technology (eg. runes with only straight lines for carving) or not using cursive for printing, but now computers can do so much, we just let everything go and try to recapture every arbitrary detail of the past we can squeeze in and people pay for that with human labor maintaining such a mountain of low-value capabilities.
I don't think rurp was saying there is no market, just that there was no obvious realistic TAM worth 1.6 trillion (going by the amount given by the S-1). How many people living remotely in an area with no fibre do you really expect there to be?
Probably not enugh found to reason for its existance thus 2 more years are needed lol. I mean lets be honest here, if they actually would have real success with baseless things like this it would be public, unless it is not for what it is sold to the public obviously