Varying Speaking Styles with Neural Text-to-Speech(developer.amazon.com)

86 pointsby georgecarlyle768 yıl önce12 comments

developer.amazon.com

Varying Speaking Styles with Neural Text-to-Speech

https://developer.amazon.com/blogs/alexa/post/7ab9665a-0536-4be2-aaad-18281ec59af8/varying-speaking-styles-with-neural-text-to-speech

13 comments

metildaa8 yıl önce

For those lolking for something not hosted by a megacorp, check out Mozilla's Text to Speech: https://github.com/mozilla/TTS/blob/master/README.md

Audio Samples: https://soundcloud.com/user-565970875

If your interested in helping improve this, spread the wors about the Common Voice project by Mozilla, a public speech corpus that is easy to help improve, which makes high caliber TTS and transcription possible ouside of walled gardens: https://voice.mozilla.org

Mozilla DeepSpeech also does Speech to Text surprisingly well: https://github.com/mozilla/DeepSpeech

kastnerkyle8 yıl önce

Worth noting that a big chunk of the core TTS code here is built on tools from other researchers like Ryuichi Yamamoto and Keith Ito, and they have great implementations to check out as well.

The best quality I have heard in OSS is probably [1] from Ryuichi using the Tacotron 2 implementation of Rayhane Mamah, which is loosely what NVidia based some of their baseline code on recently as well [3][4].

There's also a colab notebook for this stuff, so you can try it directly without any pain https://colab.research.google.com/github/r9y9/Colaboratory/b...

I also have my own pipeline for this (using some utilities from the above authors + a lot of my own hacks), for a forthcoming paper release here https://github.com/kastnerkyle/representation_mixing/tree/ma... , see the minimal demo. It has pretty fast sampling, but the audio quality is not as high as WaveNet. I'd really like to tie in with WaveGlow, but it's work in progress for me so far.

NOTE: None of these have voice adaptivity per se, but given a model which trains well already + a multispeaker dataset with IDs such as VCTK, a lot of things become possible as getting a baseline model and data pipeline for TTS is quite difficult.

[0] https://github.com/keithito/tacotron

[1] https://r9y9.github.io/blog/2018/05/20/tacotron2/

[2] https://github.com/Rayhane-mamah/Tacotron-2

[3] https://github.com/NVIDIA/waveglow

[4] https://github.com/NVIDIA/tacotron2

metildaa8 yıl önce

Building that 5000+ hour dataset needed to train quality Speech to Text is a serious challenge, and presumably TTS has a similar threshold of audio needed.

IMO that is why it is critical to spread the word about Common Voice (a CC0 licensed voice corpus) and get a large variety of people contributing to it: https://voice.mozilla.org

kastnerkyle8 yıl önce

Much less audio is potentially needed for TTS than ASR, however the spread and quality of the TTS dataset is critical which is one reason why just training on ASR datasets "in reverse" hasn't worked great. For example, commercial databases run ~25 to 50 hours, but the "coverage" of the language is usually very different from e.g. audiobooks, and focuses specifically on covering edge cases of the language. You can think of it like a 25 hour "support set" which covers as many cases as possible, and can also grow over time as users run into cases where the system fails.

This all gets worse if you want multi-speaker output of course - getting even a few speakers who all read the same large corpus is difficult. The two datasets I've gotten the most out of so far are "LJSpeech" (a subset of the LibriVox corpus), and the "Nancy Corpus / Blizzard 2013" dataset [0][1].

There's a pretty interesting corpus here that I hope to start using soon [2].

To me, the biggest issue / gap between commercial interests and publically available data is curation - TTS really hinges on well curated, clean data at least for now. And if that dataset has a very balanced coverage of triphones, that's even better.

I'd like to try on the voice.mozilla data, but given current stuggles on even 1 speaker, a truly "in the wild" set of many speakers seems pretty difficult if training from scratch. For voice cloning using pretrained weights it may be a different story.

[0] https://keithito.com/LJ-Speech-Dataset/

[1] https://www.synsig.org/index.php/Blizzard_Challenge_2013

[2] http://www.m-ailabs.bayern/en/the-mailabs-speech-dataset/

kastnerkyle8 yıl önce

This type of concatenation I first saw in Alex Graves' work on "Generating Sequences With Recurrent Neural Networks", including his unpublished TTS demo [1]. Biasing with part of another sentence (as in handwriting) can possibly improve style in TTS as well.

We followed this approach in char2wav [2], but "voice cloning" has come much farther in my opinion [3][4][5]. There's a lot of relevant research on techniques for this beyond concatenating indicators or embeddings, if people are interested in the research side of this technology.

[0] https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.0850

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-yX1SYeDHbg&t=38m30s

[2] http://josesotelo.com/speechsynthesis/

[3] https://twitter.com/Jeanne_Heo/status/972089715225542657 (lyrebird.ai)

[4] https://google.github.io/tacotron/publications/gmvae_control...

[5] https://google.github.io/tacotron/publications/speaker_adapt...

crivlaldo8 yıl önce

Is it Alexa only feature? When it will be available? Should we expect this feature in Polly? Is Amazon going to provide other styles? I'm curious.

superasn8 yıl önce

Yes I too was hoping this would be available for polly like wavenet is from Google

ai_ja_nai8 yıl önce

Totally looks like Tacotron. I heard there was interest in Amazon in buying the project, now it looks like they copied it.

Rebelgecko8 yıl önce

Interesting stuff. I noticed a few weeks ago that Google Translate will sometimes vary the pronunciation of words when you hit the audio playback button repeatedly, I wonder if they're already doing something similar.

_underflow_8 yıl önce

mrleiter8 yıl önce

Before Charlie Brooker started producing Black Mirror, he already was a highly observant critic of society and media. At one point he produced a generic news snippet of an unspecified event, where he pointed out all the standard videoshots and animations used these days to report on a topic [1]. He presented this "report" with the standard news-speak pronunciation of sentences.

With this achievement of Amazon, and the recent development by China in AI news-anchors [2], one is not far off to see news reporting being done mostly by machines. Yes, some videography must still be done manually, but the rest could be automated.

What that means for the TV news industry? I don't know, but it certainly deserves discussion.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHun58mz3vI

[2] https://www.fastcompany.com/90264587/watch-chinas-new-ai-anc...

richrichardsson8 yıl önce

I wish they would commission Newswipe again, was one of the best shows on BBC.

devoply8 yıl önce

It means everyone can have an RT or Alex Jones sort of news channel. None of this stuff of replacing people with robots is positive, it's just wishful thinking that any of this stuff in the long run is good for society or people in general.