Why are there two ways to write the lowercase letter ‘a’? (2015)(redditblog.com)
redditblog.com
Why are there two ways to write the lowercase letter ‘a’? (2015)
https://redditblog.com/2015/10/13/why-are-there-2-ways-to-write-the-lowercase-letter-a/
38 comments
While I have seen people write "a" like in print, I've never seen anyone write a "g" with two loops/storeys.
Does the G in this picture count[0]? Because that's how most people in my country would write a G when writing cursive.
[0] https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3f/Schoonsc...
[0] https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3f/Schoonsc...
> I've never seen anyone write a "g" with two loops/storeys
Cursive g has two loops.
Cursive g has two loops.
Have you seen anyone print the g with the backward loop, like the way it shows up on a typewriter, and the HN text input boxes?
The two 'g's are double-storey and single-storey (looptail/opentail):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G#Typographic_variants
FWIW the 'g's in my input box here are single-storey.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G#Typographic_variants
FWIW the 'g's in my input box here are single-storey.
Mine shows the double-story circular loop in the input box, but the single-story opentail after clicking <reply>.
Having said that, you prompted me to search for "double-story a" and sure enough, it's the same thing as with the g.
Having said that, you prompted me to search for "double-story a" and sure enough, it's the same thing as with the g.
I do. But I did it on purpose, also switched my 'a's to look typewritten, I did it when I was handwriting my college essays.
I've always written "a", just because I think the other style is ugly. I have a Christmas stocking which I insisted, long ago, on having embroidered with the same style of "a".
I tried once to write "g" with loop below as commonly printed, but I couldn't make it look decent.
I tried once to write "g" with loop below as commonly printed, but I couldn't make it look decent.
It's admittedly a bad habit of mine, but I write lowercase "g" like a numeral "8", only translated downward a little. It has two loops, and gets the point across (when I know it's only myself who will read my scrawl.)
I write it that way. Here is a sample of my handwriting: https://i.imgur.com/QgYpgIf.jpg
As a kid, I was influenced by the font used in the Neverhood to adopt this style. :) At some point I even wrote lower case 'a's like in print. That didn't stick, but the 'g's did for whatever reason.
Neverhood example: https://i.imgur.com/kjrHpsr.gif
As a kid, I was influenced by the font used in the Neverhood to adopt this style. :) At some point I even wrote lower case 'a's like in print. That didn't stick, but the 'g's did for whatever reason.
Neverhood example: https://i.imgur.com/kjrHpsr.gif
The g in dog is interesting, because while it's clearly a g in context, it would definitely read as an 8 in a vacuum.
I write my lower-case 'g' with a loop like this, although I have only ever met one other person who also does so.
Cursive, it's easier to write the g with two loops in cursive.
The answer is that people like to simplify needlessly complex things. (Example: this simple comment replacing the needlessly complex article.)
That would explain why there's only one way to write 'a', wouldn't it? The mystery is why it's not as simple as we'd expect.
[deleted]
Surprised that nobody has noticed that the “a” - with a tiny riser - is used in Roman version of many typefaces and the other “a” is used in the italic version of the font. See this article for more information on that https://creativepro.com/dont-commit-the-type-crime-of-applyi... I see this mistake being made all over the place which as a former graphic designer makes me sad.
A big benefit of using LaTeX for writing is that it enforces typography rules like this out of the box, without having to study typography beforehand. I hadn't really really why italics just look so much better in LaTeX than Word, so thanks for sharing.
Worth mentioning: LaTeX (and TeX) support "slanted" fonts that are different from "italic". Example image:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Modern#/media/File:CM...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Modern#/media/File:CM...
> True, for many typefaces, Word will automatically apply the proper italic fonts (if you have them installed)
That was good to know. Relieved me of angst for the guilt I was going to feel knowing I would never be the guy changing the font for one italicized word. :)
That was good to know. Relieved me of angst for the guilt I was going to feel knowing I would never be the guy changing the font for one italicized word. :)
[deleted]
Baskerville is one such font. The italic version is single-story, but the regular version is not.
Even worse is that this shift doesn't occur between the letters g.
Even worse is that this shift doesn't occur between the letters g.
This article is awfully US-centric. Compare French handwriting, which is different. In South America, the printed 'a' came out as a tilted triangle.
How so? It's a question in English about the English language on a primarily English website, so I would expect it to be about English, but I don't see how it is US-centric.
An interesting example of this is that handwritten hiragana (one of Japan's two non-ideographic character sets) has many variations for some characters, some of which are regional and obscure enough that people won't recognize them. In some cases the variants look like other characters, which can make it very difficult to decipher handwritten text.
In this example: http://www.shosha.kokugo.juen.ac.jp/oshiki/ronbun/currentofr... some of the less common variants (but common enough that I've encountered them) of 'wa わ' look similar to 'yu ゆ', so as a foreigner I found this very challenging and mysterious until I did the research. In comparison the various forms of English characters don't feel so bad anymore :-) If you're familiar with hiragana you'll also notice that a variant of 'を' looks quite similar to 'さ'.
Hiragana also used to include characters that are no longer used in most contexts (you'll still see them in names), like the historical 'wi ゐ' (you can't even input this with some IMEs or look it up by name in en/jp dictionaries). A historian would probably be aware of some western equivalents of this - the only one I'm familiar with is 'et &' (as in 'etc'), which you'll see in old documents as '&c'.
Oh, and how could I forget: if you ask for the USD/JPY exchange rate, Google will call it "Japanese Yen", which is written 'en 円'... because the 'ye' character is no longer a part of hiragana. (I don't actually know whether it's still commonly pronounced as 'yen'. I wouldn't be surprised...)
In this example: http://www.shosha.kokugo.juen.ac.jp/oshiki/ronbun/currentofr... some of the less common variants (but common enough that I've encountered them) of 'wa わ' look similar to 'yu ゆ', so as a foreigner I found this very challenging and mysterious until I did the research. In comparison the various forms of English characters don't feel so bad anymore :-) If you're familiar with hiragana you'll also notice that a variant of 'を' looks quite similar to 'さ'.
Hiragana also used to include characters that are no longer used in most contexts (you'll still see them in names), like the historical 'wi ゐ' (you can't even input this with some IMEs or look it up by name in en/jp dictionaries). A historian would probably be aware of some western equivalents of this - the only one I'm familiar with is 'et &' (as in 'etc'), which you'll see in old documents as '&c'.
Oh, and how could I forget: if you ask for the USD/JPY exchange rate, Google will call it "Japanese Yen", which is written 'en 円'... because the 'ye' character is no longer a part of hiragana. (I don't actually know whether it's still commonly pronounced as 'yen'. I wouldn't be surprised...)
Cool link.
さ is sometimes written with the parts joined, as an inverted ち: https://i1.sndcdn.com/avatars-000217370013-jmqo19-t240x240.j...
ゆ sometimes has the last stroke forming a loop: https://yu-yu1126.net/wp-content/themes/twentyseventeen-chil...
い is written with the parts joined, as an mirrowed "N": https://livedoor.blogimg.jp/benirabou/imgs/2/b/2b8291ac.jpg
こ I join the upper and lower parts, making it similar to 乙. The same for た and に. You can see it printed in the image above too.
し sometimes has no pronounced 'hook', becoming almost a vertical line. https://thumb.ac-illust.com/17/17111801d47c32db49b2d7fb94471... There's also a variation that has a small 'beak' in the upper parte, as ら does. https://t.pimg.jp/032/836/278/1/32836278.jpg I did no find a image with printed text of these variations quickly though.
A have never seen much variation on katanaka.
さ is sometimes written with the parts joined, as an inverted ち: https://i1.sndcdn.com/avatars-000217370013-jmqo19-t240x240.j...
ゆ sometimes has the last stroke forming a loop: https://yu-yu1126.net/wp-content/themes/twentyseventeen-chil...
い is written with the parts joined, as an mirrowed "N": https://livedoor.blogimg.jp/benirabou/imgs/2/b/2b8291ac.jpg
こ I join the upper and lower parts, making it similar to 乙. The same for た and に. You can see it printed in the image above too.
し sometimes has no pronounced 'hook', becoming almost a vertical line. https://thumb.ac-illust.com/17/17111801d47c32db49b2d7fb94471... There's also a variation that has a small 'beak' in the upper parte, as ら does. https://t.pimg.jp/032/836/278/1/32836278.jpg I did no find a image with printed text of these variations quickly though.
A have never seen much variation on katanaka.
It's not pronounced as 'yen' anymore, but it was in the past. Some of the historical kana that are not commonly used anymore, such as ゐ、ゑ used to express sounds that are not distinguished anymore, but were retained in historical orthography for a while.
It seems ゑ 'we' was pronounced 'ye' in the past (It seems え also was, at least in the middle ages, hence old forms such as Yedo for Edo 江戸)
Nowadays, ゐ is pronounced 'i' and ゑ as 'e', so words that were written with them now just use い and え instead.
ゐ、ゑ became most relegated to bring an 'antiquated' look. Think Yebisu (ヱビス) beer, written with ヱ, the katakana equivalent of ゑ, that also kept the archaism in the romanization, as Yen did. So ヱビス or ゑびす are read as 'Ebisu' even if written with the archaic kana
But some Ainu and Okinawan orthographies have adopted their used (in case of Ainu only the katakana variants, I believe)
を 'wo' (but really pronounced 'o') nowadays is only used as the 'direct object particle', but it was used in words like をとこ (男 man). As it ceased to sound different from お, subsequent orthographic reforms also removed it from use except in the particle function.
It seems ゑ 'we' was pronounced 'ye' in the past (It seems え also was, at least in the middle ages, hence old forms such as Yedo for Edo 江戸)
Nowadays, ゐ is pronounced 'i' and ゑ as 'e', so words that were written with them now just use い and え instead.
ゐ、ゑ became most relegated to bring an 'antiquated' look. Think Yebisu (ヱビス) beer, written with ヱ, the katakana equivalent of ゑ, that also kept the archaism in the romanization, as Yen did. So ヱビス or ゑびす are read as 'Ebisu' even if written with the archaic kana
But some Ainu and Okinawan orthographies have adopted their used (in case of Ainu only the katakana variants, I believe)
を 'wo' (but really pronounced 'o') nowadays is only used as the 'direct object particle', but it was used in words like をとこ (男 man). As it ceased to sound different from お, subsequent orthographic reforms also removed it from use except in the particle function.
Oh, that anecdote about 男 is fascinating. I never would have guessed. Thanks for the insight :) The various ways to pronounce the characters (particles, in particular) definitely adds another layer of depth here.
I suggest you read this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_kana_orthography
It explains the shifts in pronunciantion in Japanese, making old Japanaese kana ortography differ from actual pronunciations, as in English orthography today. The remains of the old system can still be seen in the particles:
A particular shift is medial and final h/f->w and w->∅(except) for 'wa'. This meant that non initial は was pronounced 'wa'. For example, かわ 'kawa' (river) was written as かは before the reform. The かは reflected and even older pronounciation of 'kapa' for the word
There's a shift p->f->h on the は 'row' explaining why ふ is 'fu', and why ば is 'ba', as 'b' is the voiced equivalento of 'p' and not 'h')
There was the same thing for へ, かえる 'kaeru' (frog) was written かへる historically, reflecting these changes. From wiktionary:
⟨kaperu⟩ → /kaperu/ → /kaferu/ → /kaweru/ → /kajeru/ → /kaeru/
(notice we -> ye -> e shift of ゑ here too, this one recent enough to influence the word 'Yen')
Source: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E8%9B%99#Japanese
So the particles は and へ, being pronounced 'wa' and 'e' instead of the expected 'ha' and 'he' are just remainers of this old orthography conventions, and give hints that the old form where probably pronounced 'pa' and 'pe' over a thousand years ago!
Facinating stuff indeed :)
It explains the shifts in pronunciantion in Japanese, making old Japanaese kana ortography differ from actual pronunciations, as in English orthography today. The remains of the old system can still be seen in the particles:
A particular shift is medial and final h/f->w and w->∅(except) for 'wa'. This meant that non initial は was pronounced 'wa'. For example, かわ 'kawa' (river) was written as かは before the reform. The かは reflected and even older pronounciation of 'kapa' for the word
There's a shift p->f->h on the は 'row' explaining why ふ is 'fu', and why ば is 'ba', as 'b' is the voiced equivalento of 'p' and not 'h')
There was the same thing for へ, かえる 'kaeru' (frog) was written かへる historically, reflecting these changes. From wiktionary:
⟨kaperu⟩ → /kaperu/ → /kaferu/ → /kaweru/ → /kajeru/ → /kaeru/
(notice we -> ye -> e shift of ゑ here too, this one recent enough to influence the word 'Yen')
Source: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E8%9B%99#Japanese
So the particles は and へ, being pronounced 'wa' and 'e' instead of the expected 'ha' and 'he' are just remainers of this old orthography conventions, and give hints that the old form where probably pronounced 'pa' and 'pe' over a thousand years ago!
Facinating stuff indeed :)
The question is interesting, the blog post is pretty bad at answering though. I found wikipedia much more interesting. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A#Typographic_variants
I followed a reference in that article to the article on Letter Case [0] which just blew my mind:
> The terms upper case and lower case […] originated from the common layouts of the shallow drawers called type cases used to hold the movable type for letterpress printing. Traditionally, the capital letters were stored in a separate shallow tray or "case" that was located above the case that held the small letters.
I can’t believe I’d never considered the origin of “case” in uppercase and lowercase might be an actual physical “case”.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letter_case#Terminology
> The terms upper case and lower case […] originated from the common layouts of the shallow drawers called type cases used to hold the movable type for letterpress printing. Traditionally, the capital letters were stored in a separate shallow tray or "case" that was located above the case that held the small letters.
I can’t believe I’d never considered the origin of “case” in uppercase and lowercase might be an actual physical “case”.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letter_case#Terminology
It's similar to being "out of sorts", which today (and maybe even historically) means you're not feeling well. It came from letterpress where the case of type is collectively called a "sort" and if you were trying to put together a print run and you ran out of, say, the letter 'r', you are now "out of sorts".
Excellent! Another fun thing I came across:
> During typesetting, individual sorts are picked from a type case with the right hand, and set into a composing stick held in the left hand from left to right, and as viewed by the setter upside down. As seen in the photo of the composing stick, a lower case 'q' looks like a 'd', a lower case 'b' looks like a 'p', a lower case 'p' looks like a 'b' and a lower case 'd' looks like a 'q'. This is reputed to be the origin of the expression "mind your p's and q's". It might just as easily have been "mind your b's and d's".
The history of typography and printing is lovely.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typesetting#Manual_typesetting
> During typesetting, individual sorts are picked from a type case with the right hand, and set into a composing stick held in the left hand from left to right, and as viewed by the setter upside down. As seen in the photo of the composing stick, a lower case 'q' looks like a 'd', a lower case 'b' looks like a 'p', a lower case 'p' looks like a 'b' and a lower case 'd' looks like a 'q'. This is reputed to be the origin of the expression "mind your p's and q's". It might just as easily have been "mind your b's and d's".
The history of typography and printing is lovely.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typesetting#Manual_typesetting
When I first looked at how Romans actually wrote the latin alphabet by hand I was surprised about the shape of the minuscule a: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_cursive
I find the author’s answer quite satisfying: sometimes human beings make choices for reasons they cannot remember, will never reveal, or for no reason at all.
It’s a way of saying, “I don’t know.”
It’s a way of saying, “I don’t know.”
I knew a girl named Sandra, who would write her name with one "a" in one form, and the other "a" in the other.