New service injects privacy into social media through scrambled text(arcticstartup.com)
arcticstartup.com
New service injects privacy into social media through scrambled text
http://www.arcticstartup.com/2012/01/09/neko-io-adds-private-sharing-layer-to-social-media
17 comments
Being the pragmatist that I am: Why bother with public social media if you want to say something in private? Also, from a social behavioral view, this is very rude. It's the online equivalent of 2 or more people in a group switching to speaking another language so someone else in the group can't understand the topic.
Here's an example Neko.io message for you;
"I'm on a meditation trip in India. If you really need to bother me, here's my travel schedule and emergency number; https://neko.io/m/g4hF/xcjZq85lyL9TTAjefE1GLw/xGf_TME2-G9YRl...
Neko.io is a utility. People post links to social networks all the time. The above link might look long and scrambled, but most services are shortening it automatically.
"I'm on a meditation trip in India. If you really need to bother me, here's my travel schedule and emergency number; https://neko.io/m/g4hF/xcjZq85lyL9TTAjefE1GLw/xGf_TME2-G9YRl...
Neko.io is a utility. People post links to social networks all the time. The above link might look long and scrambled, but most services are shortening it automatically.
Neko.io looks like it's trying to solve the access control list issues that Facebook has been plagued with since... forever. But it gets no further. It only exports these issues to all social networks.
Watch Zed Shaw's "The ACL is dead" presentation and you'll understand why.
Also it requires yet another non-standard authorization utility (Mepin?) or a separate login. I'm phatigued by phishing.
Watch Zed Shaw's "The ACL is dead" presentation and you'll understand why.
Also it requires yet another non-standard authorization utility (Mepin?) or a separate login. I'm phatigued by phishing.
"I really like this way of circumventing problems with privacy in social media. Rather than building your own new social media service, it makes much more sense to inject your own privacy features into anything and everything."
I really dislike this methodology. The complexity and friction it introduces excludes the vast majority of people who don't yet, and maybe never will, realise how they would benefit from it.
We need a distributed social network, which can't be taken down, censored or monitored by any organisation or government, which utilises public key crypto for privacy, and which is at least as easy to use as Facebook. An immensely difficult project to tackle, but one that would change the World.
I really dislike this methodology. The complexity and friction it introduces excludes the vast majority of people who don't yet, and maybe never will, realise how they would benefit from it.
We need a distributed social network, which can't be taken down, censored or monitored by any organisation or government, which utilises public key crypto for privacy, and which is at least as easy to use as Facebook. An immensely difficult project to tackle, but one that would change the World.
Once Facebook hears of this service they'll probably disable linking to it from Facebook, since it takes Facebook users off-site where they can't be fed Facebook's ads. A distributed social network that's not subject to the whims of a single company really seems to be the only way to get control over your privacy.
We (Meontrust Inc, the provider of Neko.io and Mepin.com) would be happy to provide public key crypto (PKI) for such a service or project. Neko.io authentication, i.e. Mepin, is based on PKI.
Does Diaspora do this? https://joindiaspora.com/ I think that's there goal, or at least something similar.
You still have to get past the friction to convince people to move away from Facebook and use that service instead.
Instead of focusing on an immensely difficult project, why not focus and a simpler one that will bring to light the privacy issue. Maybe after enough people get sick of posting links to ensure privacy, they'd be more willing to finally let Facebook go in favor of a simpler privacy sensitive service.
Instead of focusing on an immensely difficult project, why not focus and a simpler one that will bring to light the privacy issue. Maybe after enough people get sick of posting links to ensure privacy, they'd be more willing to finally let Facebook go in favor of a simpler privacy sensitive service.
be sure to use fountain codes
Maybe you shouldn't be using (public) social media then? =/
in 2004/2005 when I signed up for the facebook it was NOT a public site
I seem to remember it being that you could see anyone at your college. Which made it defacto public because strangers had access to your profile. (You had no access control with your profile). As long as I had a college email I could see anyone else's profile if they were at the same college. Networks were college based.
People were up in arms when anyone with an email address could get in and see their stuff. They wanted to expand their market. I think that was 2005. So in response they hacked in some not very good privacy features.
Maybe I am misremembering, however.
People were up in arms when anyone with an email address could get in and see their stuff. They wanted to expand their market. I think that was 2005. So in response they hacked in some not very good privacy features.
Maybe I am misremembering, however.
Isn't this what Facebook Friend Lists and Google Plus Circles are for?
Not really. Clear text messages on Fb Friend List or G+ Circles are indexed and affects your profile (towards advertizers and others), whereas Neko.io messages are encrypted and truly private. Also, the Neko.io friend list spans across any and all social networks, so you would not need to maintain lists, circles, groups, flocks, etc in various services.
Can you use Facebook Friend Lists in Twitter ?
Obviously not. I believe Twitter is the only platform of the 3 that doesn't have a built in option to do this. It seems a bit like reinventing the wheel to me but perhaps that's because I can't see myself using it. I guess the USP is really cross-platform support?
Ok I see what you mean: circles. I agree that circles are old invention. But I think security of those circles is very compromised. I like the idea about encryption with social media.