Passive Microwave Repeaters(computer.rip)
computer.rip
Passive Microwave Repeaters
https://computer.rip/2025-08-16-passive-microwave-repeaters.html
26 comments
Yes, this is what makes moon bounce (EME) attainable. The gain of the moon is about 142 dB at 1296 MHz.
And also why the moon almost started WWIII
https://blog.ucs.org/david-wright/the-moon-and-nuclear-war-9...
https://blog.ucs.org/david-wright/the-moon-and-nuclear-war-9...
if that was a palantir designed system, we'd have more WW than fast and furious movies by now.
Still used nowadays: airplane reflections are being used by ham radio dudes. There's a software around that even calculates the optimal reflection parameters based on ADS-B aggregators.
Thanks too relatively modern digital modes this doesn't need too much transmission power.
On the upper GHz bands with dishes they even manage to do reliable FM chats. But that requires a lot of gain and active steering of the dish.
Thanks too relatively modern digital modes this doesn't need too much transmission power.
On the upper GHz bands with dishes they even manage to do reliable FM chats. But that requires a lot of gain and active steering of the dish.
Idk if it works with more modern bands, but back in the GSM days I used to make calls in out-of-service areas when jets flew overhead.
GSM is a bit limited because of its Timing Adance (TA) field. It should max out at 32km.
Has it always been set to that?
I’m pretty sure that I have connected line of sight to cell sites at much longer ranges than that.
Or maybe I’m remembering an old pre-gsm TDMA phone?
I’m pretty sure that I have connected line of sight to cell sites at much longer ranges than that.
Or maybe I’m remembering an old pre-gsm TDMA phone?
Sounds like fun! Do you remember the name of the software?
Most likely it's FT8 or a more modern mode.
Very topical item, with NISAR unfurling to it's full 39 foot deployment up in space.
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/giant-radar-antenna-reflector-...
https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/giant-radar-antenna-reflector-...
“The mission scans nearly all the planet’s land and ice surfaces twice every 12 days.” What was wrong with saying once every 6 days?
One scenario would be if it scanned it once in 8 days and once in 4 days, due to, say, an elliptical orbit or something. Thus, twice in 12 days, but not once every 6 days.
Alternately, complex orbital tracks may result in irregular accumulation of multiple scans, with double scanning only finally being achieved after 12 days.
Alternately, complex orbital tracks may result in irregular accumulation of multiple scans, with double scanning only finally being achieved after 12 days.
I think it's because they're scanning in two different wavelengths:
> In a first, the satellite combines two synthetic aperture radar (SAR) systems: an L-band system that can see through clouds and forest canopy, and an S-band system that can see through clouds as well but is more sensitive to light vegetation and moisture in snow.
> In a first, the satellite combines two synthetic aperture radar (SAR) systems: an L-band system that can see through clouds and forest canopy, and an S-band system that can see through clouds as well but is more sensitive to light vegetation and moisture in snow.
Whoa incredible! Can you believe it does four scans every 24 days?!
Also briefly attempted in space in the 1960's,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Echo
Radio astronomy was an accidental offshoot of this project: they noticed the reflected microwave signals from space came back with some extra noise...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Echo
Radio astronomy was an accidental offshoot of this project: they noticed the reflected microwave signals from space came back with some extra noise...
> Radio astronomy was an accidental offshoot of this project: they noticed the reflected microwave signals from space came back with some extra noise...
Perhaps you're conflating Project Echo with Karl Janksy's Bell Labs research in the 1930s? Radio astronomy's "birth" is probably best set to when Jansky detected radio emission from the Milky Way in 1932-1933 while trying to identify the source of noise in wireless telephone transmissions.
Grote Reber picked up radio astronomy in the pre-war (WWII) years and then the advancement of RF technology for radar during WWII led to some further discoveries (e.g., radio emission from the Sun). After WWII, radio astronomy initially had good participation from radar folks.
Many national radio observatories were already in existence before Project Echo. Jodrell Bank Observatory (UK) was established in 1945. ASTRON (Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy) was founded in 1949. The US's Green Bank Observatory was created in 1956 and this led to the creation of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory in 1959. Parkes, in Australia, was completed by 1961.
Radio astronomy was well under way before Project Echo.
Perhaps you're conflating Project Echo with Karl Janksy's Bell Labs research in the 1930s? Radio astronomy's "birth" is probably best set to when Jansky detected radio emission from the Milky Way in 1932-1933 while trying to identify the source of noise in wireless telephone transmissions.
Grote Reber picked up radio astronomy in the pre-war (WWII) years and then the advancement of RF technology for radar during WWII led to some further discoveries (e.g., radio emission from the Sun). After WWII, radio astronomy initially had good participation from radar folks.
Many national radio observatories were already in existence before Project Echo. Jodrell Bank Observatory (UK) was established in 1945. ASTRON (Netherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy) was founded in 1949. The US's Green Bank Observatory was created in 1956 and this led to the creation of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory in 1959. Parkes, in Australia, was completed by 1961.
Radio astronomy was well under way before Project Echo.
> The cavity magnetron, one of the first practical microwave transmitters, was an invention of such import that it was the UK's key contribution to a technical partnership that lead to the UK's access to US nuclear weapons research.
No, that's not correct at all. The Tube Alloys project[0] was the key, codified in the Quebec Agreement[1], giving the USA access to UK nuclear weapons research.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tube_Alloys [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quebec_Agreement
It is an item of some irritation to me that many people think the USA was the nation which started nuclear weapons development first. "In July 1940, Britain had offered to give the United States access to its research, and the Tizard Mission's John Cockcroft briefed American scientists on British developments. He discovered that the American project was smaller than the British, and not as advanced."
No, that's not correct at all. The Tube Alloys project[0] was the key, codified in the Quebec Agreement[1], giving the USA access to UK nuclear weapons research.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tube_Alloys [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quebec_Agreement
It is an item of some irritation to me that many people think the USA was the nation which started nuclear weapons development first. "In July 1940, Britain had offered to give the United States access to its research, and the Tizard Mission's John Cockcroft briefed American scientists on British developments. He discovered that the American project was smaller than the British, and not as advanced."
I'm referring to the Tizard mission exactly, in which Cockcroft brought a magnetron to the US for show and tell. Nuclear weapons were less of an emphasis than radar (and jet engines, also a UK-led development) at that point in time.
Wasn't the hardened valves for use in fuses also an important part of the Tizard mission?
Yes! I will draw a slightly roundabout connection here to my pet topics, the British shared a number of fuze concepts as part of the Tizard mission and designs based in large part on the British concepts were developed and tested at the New Mexico Proving Grounds, part of what would later become Kirtland Air Force Base. Much of this work was directed by physicist E. J. Workman, president of the New Mexico School of Mines.
I could probably rewrite the above sentence to improve it, but I focused on the magnetron because it was seen to be of special significance at the time (directly addressed issues that US efforts at e.g. MIT Radiation Laboratory were struggling with) and that there's an interesting story surrounding the couriering of the "most secret" magnetron to the US (it was briefly lost). These were the early days of "classified" as a concept and consistent techniques around safeguarding classified matter hadn't been developed, so the magnetron plays an interesting role there as well (along with documents on a number of topics, but I believe the magnetron was the only "physical artifact" brought by the Tizard mission).
I could probably rewrite the above sentence to improve it, but I focused on the magnetron because it was seen to be of special significance at the time (directly addressed issues that US efforts at e.g. MIT Radiation Laboratory were struggling with) and that there's an interesting story surrounding the couriering of the "most secret" magnetron to the US (it was briefly lost). These were the early days of "classified" as a concept and consistent techniques around safeguarding classified matter hadn't been developed, so the magnetron plays an interesting role there as well (along with documents on a number of topics, but I believe the magnetron was the only "physical artifact" brought by the Tizard mission).
A passive mirror for LTE installed in 2016 and currently in use in Argentina:
https://www.reddit.com/r/cellmapper/comments/1h4i1cl/passive...
https://www.reddit.com/r/cellmapper/comments/1h4i1cl/passive...
Shown are reflectors. Two dishes back to back is possible too. Our telco had such an array on top of a mountain to jump over it.
It's mentioned in the end notes:
For the sake of simplicity I have used "passive repeater" here to refer to microwave reflectors only, but the same term is also used for arrangements of two antennas connected back-to-back. These are much more common in VHF/UHF than in the microwave, although microwave passive repeaters of two parabolic antennas have been used in limited cases.
For the sake of simplicity I have used "passive repeater" here to refer to microwave reflectors only, but the same term is also used for arrangements of two antennas connected back-to-back. These are much more common in VHF/UHF than in the microwave, although microwave passive repeaters of two parabolic antennas have been used in limited cases.
In theory this works with VHF frequencies as well using high-gain antennas (i.e. Yagi or dish).
Turns out the way that the gain of a passive reflector seems to be measured is: "the ratio of the power density at a distant point due to the passive repeater to the power density which would exist at the same point" if the repeater were replaced by a matched antenna (or basically nothing at all).
So basically it's a measure of how much better the signal is when you add the reflector, and that's why it can achieve such high gains: because the signals traveling so far are already being atmospherically attenuated by hundreds of dB. Maybe that's not new information to others.
Anyways, cool stuff. Sometimes the best solutions are the simplest.
http://www.gbppr.net/splat/Passive-Repeater-Engineering.pdf#...