I've been developing a theoretical derivation that treats the early universe as a computational system hitting an entropy wall. By applying the Radix Economy Law (from computer science) to M-Theory/holographic stability, the math seems to yield the ~60 e-folds of Cosmic Inflation as a "Quantization Snap" down to Base-3 (Ternary).
I suspect there may be a flaw in the holographic stability bounds or the diffusion latency math, but I am seeking a rigorous critique from anyone familiar with Information Theory and scalar-field cosmology.
The full derivations and paper are at: https://entropic-limit.org
Is this a valid way to approach the trans-Planckian problem, or is there a fundamental breakdown in the radix economy application?
0 comments
—
Ask HN: Does treating Inflation as a "Quantization Snap" resolve slow-roll? · HackerTrans
I suspect there may be a flaw in the holographic stability bounds or the diffusion latency math, but I am seeking a rigorous critique from anyone familiar with Information Theory and scalar-field cosmology.
The full derivations and paper are at: https://entropic-limit.org
Is this a valid way to approach the trans-Planckian problem, or is there a fundamental breakdown in the radix economy application?