Ask HN: Why hasn't someone built a decentralized compute network?
9 comments
There are decentralized systems out there, like torrents, but they are just too inconvenient. That's why they end up being used mostly for illegal sharing or niche academic stuff. Even Bitcoin is a great example. It was supposed to be completely decentralized, but if you look at reality, it's just been absorbed into centralized systems like big exchanges and mining pools
We have chutes.ai for distributed GPU computing and it seems to be quite successful.
https://chutes.ai/platform
Tokens processed through OpenRouter gateway: https://openrouter.ai/provider/chutes
https://chutes.ai/platform
Tokens processed through OpenRouter gateway: https://openrouter.ai/provider/chutes
decentralized is a funny thing. people often say they want decentralized and say that’ll be great! No one person/company in charge. But is that what people want? Usually they want some kind of benevolent dictator instead.
Look up grid computing. It never really took off.
really? I mean there's this little book company called Amazon who will let you use their interweb computers for a few dollars per hour. They'll sell you coffee as well.
You mean the internet?
There’s lots of cool examples of interesting things people have tried, (training models, etc) but it’s not easy to get traction.
Something like vast.ai is much easier to make fly because people who offer their resources for rent get directly paid by time used.
In short, it’s a cool idea that lots of people want but it’s hard to make fly.
Edit: also I guess we could consider malware / botnets successful implementations as well - for nefarious purposes.