Well if it wasn't Greg, then I feel like I need to ask--why the heck would you use he/him to refer to Justine? I'm glad you've changed your mind and referred to her with they/them above, though!
> they can't just make a PR to fix it, because the models were already converted to that magic string that was changed for no reason.
I _think_ the magic string was changed _because_ of versioning issues--it sounds like you're arguing that the magic version number _instead_ of the magic string should've been changed...but it sounds like Justine _was_ concerned with versioning, even if the versioning wasn't done in what you're saying is the best possible way. I just don't think that "one magic number was changed instead of another magic number" really warrants this level of animosity.
> This PR was written in collaboration with @slaren. This PR is also rebased on
PR #586 so please do not squash merge! Use either merge or rebase.
jart made sure to that the other user got credit, in addition to making sure that their name was properly attributed in the commit log. Given all this, it feels like the drama--shouldn't exist? Like, if there's an issue with attribution, it's not because of bad-faith, and I feel like a good-faith conversation could have just resolved this, instead of bringing in trolls.
> they can't just make a PR to fix it, because the models were already converted to that magic string that was changed for no reason.
I _think_ the magic string was changed _because_ of versioning issues--it sounds like you're arguing that the magic version number _instead_ of the magic string should've been changed...but it sounds like Justine _was_ concerned with versioning, even if the versioning wasn't done in what you're saying is the best possible way. I just don't think that "one magic number was changed instead of another magic number" really warrants this level of animosity.