Theoretically - if the plane had landed, how many planes would it have taken out? It obviously wouldn't have been pretty, but I doubt the AirCanada would have reached the fourth plane, or maybe even the third.
That's pretty disturbing. Though to be fair, the article in question was written a while ago (since it targets .NET 2005), and to be less fair, MS doesn't really review their documentation very well, at all.
Can someone explain this to me? I'm only familiar with the current regulations and so the logic of this paragraph doesn't make sense to me:
> Back in 2006, the regulations required teams to qualify their cars with race fuel-loads. The trade-offs were obvious – load the car up with fuel and you’d end up further down the grid, but with the benefit and flexibility of adjusting your strategy in the race. By contrast, qualify on petrol fumes and you had a good chance to be quick on Saturday, but you’d theoretically start the race with one hand tied behind your back.
Legacy Bitcoin fees can be higher than their actual monthly plans.