Stack Overflow was the
"what is wrong with the api?"
"What api to use?"
"How to improve api usage/syntax?"
place.
"Whats is wrong with the api?": moved to github, because its the source.
"What api to use?": stackoverflow is still the place to go (or chatgpt).
"How to improve api usage/syntax?" stackoverflow / chatpgt.
Github could really dominate with its own LLM in the web and Stackoverflow could regain some shares with an integrated LLM.
PS: I don't like Github Copilot because of UX and code upload.
i think its also a problem of funding. the problems of today are more resource intensive. i read that succesfull test to use mrna for medical treatment were done 20 years ago and nobody realy cared and knew about it. To realy develop into something viable took years to get the attention and funding.
i think the differents is the lak of technical responses on the github issue from ms employees on why this was cut. This leaves only politcal reasons, which the normal ms staff don't make.
I understand that MS is still here to make money. Everybody wants to do that. What i don't understand is to risk the good will of the open source coummunity, by denying a core flagship feature another competitor (flutter/google) has included for free. I donk think this is a smart choice, even if i am in it for the money.
"Whats is wrong with the api?": moved to github, because its the source. "What api to use?": stackoverflow is still the place to go (or chatgpt). "How to improve api usage/syntax?" stackoverflow / chatpgt.
Github could really dominate with its own LLM in the web and Stackoverflow could regain some shares with an integrated LLM.
PS: I don't like Github Copilot because of UX and code upload.