Both can be true: this can be a targeted raid by an administration obsessed with petrol powered vehicles, and the Korean workers are working illegally.
>Much more likely? 450 koreans working here legally but not carrying papers on them because american is supposed to be a free country.
The facts will inevitably be: hundreds of Korean nationals were illegally working in the US. The correction will be a small blurb somewhere, posted months from now, after the next fake new outrage comes about.
Wrong, it's simply true. Solar panels use land poorly, the MW per unit area is poor.
>You can grow crops and graze under the panels
Agrovoltaics accounts for less than 0.5% of commercial solar installations in rural lands. Effectively no one is doing this, it's not cost effective. You can't fit tractors/combines between the panels.
>And tend not to be put up on your own land without your consent.
What do you mean? No one is putting pump jacks on property without the owners consent.
Not sure why you're being downvoted, but for the people in the back: "Open source is not a business model!" As RMS has stated on multiple occasions, it's not a business model and has never been a business model. It is a model to enshrine software freedoms. Nothing more, nothing less.
There's a reason why some call MIT/BSD licenses "cuck licenses." If you don't want others to profit off your hard work... don't pick a license that lets other profit off your work...
>One thing I will say though, is that proof-of-work alone isn't a solution for ddos mitigation and bot protection! I've seen attackers using a mass of proxies and headless browsers to solve the challenge
If you make the challenge sufficiently difficult enough, it should mitigate this no?