I was fine with that, until the moment I realized that the video showing the end product described in that short article was hosted on a social network reserving access to users.
Too bad. Oh well.
Does that mean something for our usage of graph? Is there folks out-there who would benefit from being able to know stuff about a graph just by knowing it has pentagon in it? ( or vice versa )
The article is enjoyable to read. I smiled at "well, we can't do a general proof at the moment, and it might be a lot of work to do so still. But, if we put a hat on the pentagon, we can prove it"
I stick to LTS.
I sometime have to update the kernel because of hardware devices or special needs. But even then, I use grub to pick witch kernel I wanna use.
Once the next LTS is out, I usually wait a few more months. I'm not a big fan of having my workstation not being able to do basic things. ( no hard feelings, I trust the process )
It's a blog post. I find it fair game to focus on the shiny objects.
I see your point about Microsoft and Google, at the same time, does it have to be a bad things? As long as it stays open source, and it's not `shell` capacity without the optimized code like Chromium or Android are.
That's my tactic to blend-in in a engineering team and gain some respect / credibility.
I try to find the most boring, utterly broken part, that nobody wants to touch... and I sink time into it.
DeltaChat, it's encrypted email that present itself as a chat.
You can use your own smtp, or use a existing one. It only needs to be able to create a folder locally and use GPG.
( the smtp, the client app has passed the mom test of installation )