The British Isles is a geographic term. It includes(&always has) Ireland given that Ireland is a part of the British Isles but has never been part of Great Britain (the land mass).
The United Kingdom you refer to has a fuller name - "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland" (past) replaced by "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) (present).
I assume you're familiar enough with history to recognise that Ireland(landmass/people/culture) was a colony of the British (with or without your pedantry)?
Always choose this app but find myself using Irfan view for printing nearly every time as the Windows native print dialog which paint.net and other image apps use to be severely lacking.
> But Donegal is, essentially, 100% Hicktown. It's a rural lifestyle and you raise cows or you farm or you cut peat bogs or something.
This is possibly the most uninformed and ignorant thing I've read on here in quite some time.
> I have been doing extensive genealogical work lately, and my ancestors hail from County Donegal
Well, that definitely qualifies you as an expert.
You know there are actual Irish people on this site with far more local knowledge than yourself?
It's not just other uninformed Americans who you may have become accustomed to swallowing your utter braindead nonsense.
Donegal is a rural area - correct. It also (shocker!) has international software companies there(like SITA!). Ireland is geographically small so remote isn't hours on end to reach civilization. But I don't want to disperse any more tales your ancestors may have passed down through the family.
At the end of the day, wireless means they're sending a signal on some frequency over the air(either up to satellite, down to ground stations or on some axis emanating from the aircraft using some known or as of yet unknown medium). If it can be detected, it can be blocked through brute force flooding with noise.
You can't remote control something if it can't receive signal from source and (less importantly) (in effect) can't send signal back to source.
Flagged.
The submitted title isn't the article title.
You are the only person posting links to this domain.
This isn't growth hacking. It's spam.
I am very dubious how this got 4 upvotes already as the article is completely void of content.
Although China also has most of the crappy knock-off drone brands that don't get the fundamentals right.
As commenter further up said:
" If they don't want that to be the case, someone would need to crack down on the lies and knockoffs."
Even though China can and has done good manufacturing and engineering, I think of crappy knockoffs when I think of Chinese engineering.
Not so much for the Germans or the Swiss.
Given how much power the CCP has, they could rectify this in no time. Much like a corporation, they seem to be focused on short term gains (lots of tiny profits coming from knockoffs and frankly dangerous products which don't comply with laws of buyer's country) rather than medium/long term reputation.
To add to that, the forced data sharing and backdoors CCP forces companies to install just means they're eroding international trust in Chinese companies at the expense of long term reputation.
I feel bad for any actual Chinese engineering companies because they will have that reputation no matter what as long as they are China HQ'd.
Is that a comment on confidently ignorant youthful comments or is that anecdote something you think resembles truth because someone once said it. It was spoken; therefore it is?
> All the hidden “ready to be inserted into the DOM” elements also need server side code to re-render things the same way.
There seems to be some confusion. With your list example, you still make an ajax call to create a new ToDo, the server returns html which is inserted into DOM.
You'll be making an ajax call anyway, except instead of just 200 reponse/json , you'll get html. This is server side rendered. There is no """hidden “ready to be inserted into the DOM” elements"""
Yes, forms are something which, depending on complexity, can be better served with SPA type solution.
If it's not complex, I'd still keep rendering server side and just add small bit of JS logic to update form header to add/remove to error list and just replace form input field with server response.
> You could use AJAX to tell the server to add the new item, but now you need to update your UI list accordingly. You could use jQuery to construct a new DOM element and append it, but now that list element exists in two different places: in your jQuery code and in your template on the server.
Your server can just return html which is ready to be inserted into DOM. You don't need to duplicate the node view creation logic client side.