Gazprom is on the stock market, merely state owned
The Swiss National Bank is also publicly traded, which is AMAZING since all they do is buy Apple shares with money that didn't previously exist, like an infinite credit line you never have to pay back.
This deal would be most like having a publicly traded central bank, instead of slightly diluting their currency they just slightly dilute oil prices as if they were a currency or shares. But yes investors aren't clear on how it would be good for investors.
thats good tongue in cheek comedy as long as you know why it isn't accurate.
in this case the nodes in a blockchain can execute arbitrary tasks, its like access to a ton of Amazon Lambda machines. You have to pay them gas - or whatever currency/fuel/commodity powers that ecosystem - and you can execute commands to your heart's content, as long as the gas is tolerable.
Ethereum's nodes would probably be limited in what they could execute, more in line with your joke, but there are several distributed processing applications built on top of Ethereum such as iExecRLC. You can use their token to run your billions of records analysis.
Its more in line with your "past" observation. Just distributed computing with the economic incentives more broadly aligned instead of praying for altruism.
-you pay less for an order
-it takes less time for your order to get filled
-more efficient pricing
-liquidity ripples out into risk management products derived from thick order books
-easier to manage risk
-lower cost of transaction
"badput"
-hard to compete against the liquidity providers
-they have unparalleled view of order flow, which runs counter to a market with fair equal access to information
it is right at the intersection of things you are more familiar with in tech:
aggregating user data and selling it.
people with dis-equal access to service and collecting everyone else's orders midstream and selling it:
the machine two racks away from the matching engine is selling information to the machine one rack away from the matching engine
and this goes all the way out to your broker, your etrade or robinhood who is selling all of your profile and trade data to the machine two racks away from the matching engine
it adds a lot of value for a lot of people. the actual femtosecond trade isn't what anybody cares about.
regarding the equality, it wasn't that long ago where you had dis-equal access if you couldn't physically be at the stock exchange, in fact thats where you were supposed to be if you wanted to trade. so I can't buy that argument, in isolation.
I do think it is a form of front-running, which is regulated in some capacity but very specifically worded such that your broker can't place a trade before you just because they found out you wanted to. what we have here is front-running but from different unrelated companies in the chain and all automated by machine.
its why people choose ICOs: immediate liquidity with the biggest "controversy" being that VCs get to buy at a lower price.
this is distinct from a decade+ long private equity drama, only to find out that you, all employees and even the founders get nothing from the exit event. This is where getting to the exit is wrought with landmines, just to find out your particular exit is horrible but a fairly standard affair.
now that there is competition lets talk about what we can do to make both markets better
> The average protonmail user doesn't care and/or know why using a credit card could be a problem.
Right, which is hilarious.
> As always with great (/s) solutions proposed on HN
Using an opportunity to patronize without understanding my perspective at all. Interesting... (cont.)
> it's neither simple, nor are there any great incentives for providers or is there consumer demand.
Despite not knowing or caring that I would agree with this.
Anyway! The landscape of cloud service providers always has providers that don't care about outsized consumer demand. Therefore this seems to be more of an educational issue as well as an assertiveness issue distinct from one related to the practicality of running a cloud service.
I've watched Indian movies that were controversial in India or some Indian states, and I can see how the western audience or curator could totally not understand what an Indian audience would agree with.
There was one Indian movie from 2004 that was controversial because it featured a lesbian couple. The movie had the typical bollywood love triangle, except the guy was ANGRY that the beautiful woman wanted to see another beautiful woman, along with seeing him. He expressed his anger and was trying to break up this "unholy arrangement" and correct the one woman into loving a man, and exclusively.
I'm more used to men expending all of their energy trying to get into situations with two beautiful women, and then accepting the improbability of two equally attractive and bi-sexual women existing.
So this movie was pure comedy to me, as well as the Indian state's extreme response. Just india things.
It is hard to understand the ideological assumptions of that pervasively conservative but kinda-wannabe-westernized society.
Payments with Monero use would have solved and prevented the donor data from being leaked.
I'm still a little distressed at how few web-anything providers accept Monero.
Privacy focused email services and cloud service providers should be using it
but what we really have is protonmail only accepting credit cards and nobody seems to see the irony in that.
occassionally in the past I have found email and cloud service providers accepting Bitcoin, and I shapeshifted Monero over TOR to pay for the invoice. Nobody knows who I am and they received the bitcoin they were looking for.
But that was YEARS ago, 2015? 2016? Seems the possibilities have gotten worse for now
I used to pursue highly compensated careers, and now I don't rely on a paycheck. I occasionally pursue some high value commission deals just because I have the network for it, and this can top up my accounts whenever.
I travel a lot and go to a lot of coveted events: it isn't that expensive.
If you already had a highly compensated career (low six figures, high 5 figures in a no-income-tax state), your biggest issue was time.
Stock market fluctuations cost more than going out. Being on the wrong side of the market costs more than the last minute flight to the other side of the world in the middle of summer.
What do you think your friends really did that you abstained from? I'm sure you have a couple of observations, but I think the real conclusion is that you missed out. Quitting work and raising a child is a coveted outcome, for some, but I don't think you know if your colleagues have stunted wealth just because they did things more fulfilling to them.
a "race to the bottom" is when people offer better and better services at lower and lower prices, in an almost comical way because the people interested in that trade exert a high level of discipline and are not rewarded for it.
such was the case of graphic design in pakistan, and still is.
Honestly I have never seen any drama from Pakistan that matched my expectations of due process.
The rebuttals and speculation are mildly entertaining, and the finality of their court garners no respect from me either way.
If the whole case hinged on the font actually existing in the wild in some capacity but the probability that it was on someone's computer at that point in time, yet some obvious to me possibilities were never even brought up, then all I can say is "lol, Pakistan."
Its not my problem that the defense never brought it up.
Shows a real lack of imagination.
"Actually we used to moonlight on Craigslist and routinely searched for fonts in leaked beta software to differentiate ourselves"
Now I'm being facetious.
But there are a lot of probable ways a font was added, ESPECIALLY for people that aren't good with computers. A toolbar added by a hacker group could have stolen fonts in it.
The Swiss National Bank is also publicly traded, which is AMAZING since all they do is buy Apple shares with money that didn't previously exist, like an infinite credit line you never have to pay back.
This deal would be most like having a publicly traded central bank, instead of slightly diluting their currency they just slightly dilute oil prices as if they were a currency or shares. But yes investors aren't clear on how it would be good for investors.